Your message dated Thu, 23 May 2013 17:22:57 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#674144: weboob: New upstream available and proposition 
for numerous fix
has caused the Debian Bug report #674144,
regarding weboob: New upstream available and proposition for numerous fix
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
674144: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674144
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: weboob
Version: 0.b-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

  Hi,

  I saw that weboob 0.c is available. Can you push it to Debian?

  I also saw you git packaging at
git://git.symlink.me/pub/romain/weboob-packaging.git

  I tried to improve it a little. You can find the result here:
git://git.ligforge.imag.fr/git/users/vdanjean/debian/weboob.git
I would be very pleased if you are interested my my suggestions.
Note that debian patches whose name begin by for-upstream should
probably be pushed upstream instead of beeing kept as debian patches.

  Regards,
    Vincent

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages weboob depends on:
ii  python              2.7.2-10
ii  python-html2text    3.200.3-2
ii  python-prettytable  0.6-1
ii  python-weboob-core  <none>
ii  python2.6           2.6.7-4
ii  python2.7           2.7.3~rc2-2.1

weboob recommends no packages.

weboob suggests no packages.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:55:20PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>   I saw that weboob 0.c is available. Can you push it to Debian?
> 
>   I also saw you git packaging at
> git://git.symlink.me/pub/romain/weboob-packaging.git

Heya Vincent, we've just uploaded 0.f to unstable, so I'm closing this
bug as no longer relevant.

The packaging is now in collab-maint at:

  http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/weboob.git;a=summary

If you've suggestions / patches, they're more than welcome! It should be
now trivial for all DDs (and collab-maint members) to contribute to the
packaging.

TIA,
Cheers.
-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli  . . . . . . .  [email protected] . . . . o . . . o . o
Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o
Former Debian Project Leader  . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o .
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to