Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2013 10:22:01 +0300 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#660184: libapache2-mod-perl2: why MP_USE_GTOP? has caused the Debian Bug report #660184, regarding libapache2-mod-perl2: why MP_USE_GTOP? to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 660184: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660184 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: libapache2-mod-perl2 Version: 2.0.5-5 Fred Moyer from upstream in #650675: > > MP_USE_GTOP=1 \ > Is gtop desired for any particular reason? I would think production > machines may not want it enabled by default. Given Package: libgtop2-dev Description-en: gtop system monitoring library (devel) The gtop library reads information about processes and the state of the system. It is used by the GNOME desktop environment. and libapache2-mod-perl2 (1.99.09-1) experimental; urgency=low [...] * Update build-deps (libgdbm{,g1}-dev and libgtop{1,2}-dev) and link rules. [...] -- Andres Salomon <[email protected]> Sat, 26 Jul 2003 01:29:05 -0400 it looks like this might be old baggage that we should simply drop? Also, I don't see libgtop2 in the dependencies. Is it linked in statically, or is debian/patches/001-gtop2.patch really unused? - return " -lgtop -lgtop_sysdeps -lgtop_common $xlibs"; + return " -lgtop-2.0 -lgtop_sysdeps-2.0 -lgtop_common-2.0 $xlibs"; -- Niko Tyni [email protected]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 2.0.8+httpd24-r1449661-1 On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:35:43AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > Package: libapache2-mod-perl2 > Version: 2.0.5-5 > > Fred Moyer from upstream in #650675: > > > > MP_USE_GTOP=1 \ > > Is gtop desired for any particular reason? I would think production > > machines may not want it enabled by default. > it looks like this might be old baggage that we should simply drop? > > Also, I don't see libgtop2 in the dependencies. Is it linked in statically, > or is debian/patches/001-gtop2.patch really unused? Dropped in 2.0.8+httpd24-r1449661-1, closing. -- Niko Tyni [email protected]
--- End Message ---
