Your message dated Thu, 04 Jul 2013 09:30:23 +0200 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#714885: libgc: FTBFS on sparc64: needs symbols file update has caused the Debian Bug report #714885, regarding libgc: FTBFS on sparc64: needs symbols file update to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 714885: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714885 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: libgc Version: 7.2d-4 Severity: important Tags: patch libgc fails to build on sparc64, as some symbols are not correctly listed in the symbol files. The patch below fixes that, basically sparc64 behaves like sparc. Would it be possible to include it in the next upload? Thanks in advance. diff -Nru libgc-7.2d/debian/libgc1c2.symbols libgc-7.2d/debian/libgc1c2.symbols --- libgc-7.2d/debian/libgc1c2.symbols 2013-07-02 15:34:17.000000000 +0000 +++ libgc-7.2d/debian/libgc1c2.symbols 2013-07-03 16:30:54.000000000 +0000 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ libgc.so.1 libgc1c2 #MINVER# GC_FirstDLOpenedLinkMap@Base 1:7.2d (arch=kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386)GC_FreeBSDGetDataStart@Base 1:7.2d - (arch=sparc)GC_SysVGetDataStart@Base 1:7.2d + (arch=sparc sparc64)GC_SysVGetDataStart@Base 1:7.2d GC_abort@Base 1:7.2d GC_add_ext_descriptor@Base 1:7.2d GC_add_map_entry@Base 1:7.2d @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ GC_core_malloc@Base 1:7.2d GC_core_malloc_atomic@Base 1:7.2d GC_current_warn_proc@Base 1:7.2d - (arch=!kfreebsd-amd64 !kfreebsd-i386 !mips !mipsel !s390 !s390x !sparc)GC_data_start@Base 1:7.2d + (arch=!kfreebsd-amd64 !kfreebsd-i386 !mips !mipsel !s390 !s390x !sparc !sparc64)GC_data_start@Base 1:7.2d GC_debug_change_stubborn@Base 1:7.2d GC_debug_end_stubborn_change@Base 1:7.2d GC_debug_free@Base 1:7.2d @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ GC_init_explicit_typing@Base 1:7.2d GC_init_gcj_malloc@Base 1:7.2d GC_init_headers@Base 1:7.2d - (arch=!kfreebsd-amd64 !kfreebsd-i386 !mips !mipsel !s390 !s390x !sparc)GC_init_linux_data_start@Base 1:7.2d + (arch=!kfreebsd-amd64 !kfreebsd-i386 !mips !mipsel !s390 !s390x !sparc !sparc64)GC_init_linux_data_start@Base 1:7.2d GC_init_parallel@Base 1:7.2d GC_init_size_map@Base 1:7.2d GC_init_thread_local@Base 1:7.2d @@ -485,8 +485,8 @@ GC_roots_present@Base 1:7.2d GC_same_obj@Base 1:7.2d GC_same_obj_print_proc@Base 1:7.2d - (arch=ia64 sparc)GC_save_regs_in_stack@Base 1:7.2d - (arch=ia64 sparc)GC_save_regs_ret_val@Base 1:7.2d + (arch=ia64 sparc sparc64)GC_save_regs_in_stack@Base 1:7.2d + (arch=ia64 sparc sparc64)GC_save_regs_ret_val@Base 1:7.2d GC_scratch_alloc@Base 1:7.2d GC_set_all_interior_pointers@Base 1:7.2d GC_set_and_save_fault_handler@Base 1:7.2d @@ -577,12 +577,12 @@ GC_world_stopped@Base 1:7.2d GC_write@Base 1:7.2d (arch=amd64 i386 ia64)GC_write_fault_handler@Base 1:7.2d - (arch=sparc)_etext@Base 1:7.2d + (arch=sparc sparc64)_etext@Base 1:7.2d (arch=kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386)etext@Base 1:7.2d libgccpp.so.1 libgc1c2 #MINVER# _ZdaPv@Base 1:7.2d _ZdlPv@Base 1:7.2d (subst)_Zna{size_t}@Base 1:7.2d (subst)_Znw{size_t}@Base 1:7.2d - (arch=sparc)_etext@Base 1:7.2d + (arch=sparc sparc64)_etext@Base 1:7.2d (arch=kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386)etext@Base 1:7.2d -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unreleased APT policy: (500, 'unreleased'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: sparc64 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-sparc64 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 7.2d-5 Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> writes: > libgc fails to build on sparc64, as some symbols are not correctly > listed in the symbol files. The patch below fixes that, basically > sparc64 behaves like sparc. Would it be possible to include it in the > next upload? Thanks in advance. Debian-ports (without hppa) has been included in -5. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer
--- End Message ---
