Your message dated Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:11:40 +0200
with message-id <20130711091140.GA973@krustenbook>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #684921,
regarding accessodf: should be named libreoffice-*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
684921: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684921
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: accessodf
Version: 0.1-1.1
Severity: important
I've no idea how you came to name this "accessodf" when there were various
extensions
already in Debian (of one you even copied maintainer scripts)...
This package contains a LibreOffice extension so it should be named
libreoffice-*.
openoffice.org is just a dummy package and unopkg is from libreoffice
anyways.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages accessodf depends on:
ii default-jre 1:1.6-47
pn libcommons-collections-java <none>
ii libreoffice-writer 1:3.6.0-1
accessodf recommends no packages.
accessodf suggests no packages.
Regards,
Rene
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
