Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2013 13:14:18 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#697955: Regression: stutter with broadcast wav/MP3
has caused the Debian Bug report #697955,
regarding Regression: stutter with broadcast wav/MP3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
697955: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697955
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gstreamer1.0-plugins-good
Version: 1.0.5-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Hi!
I don't know which of the many packages is actually decoding the file,
so feel free to reassign the bug to gstreamer1.0-plugins-{ugly,bad}.
I have this broadcast wav with an embedded MP3 file:
http://adi.loris.tv/broken.wav
Plays fine in gstreamer-0.10 but stutters with 1.0.x. I'd say this
qualifies as a regression, but it's certainly upstream.
How to proceed? Do you guys have good connections to upstream to forward
this bug report? If need be, I could file one myself, but I don't have a
gnome bug account and don't really want one.
Note that Ubuntu is equally affected (tested with 12.10 and ~13.04).
Cheers
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.7.1 (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to
en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages gstreamer1.0-plugins-good depends on:
ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-base 1.0.5-1
ii libaa1 1.4p5-40
ii libavc1394-0 0.5.4-1
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.6-4
ii libc6 2.13-37
ii libcaca0 0.99.beta18-1
ii libdv4 1.0.0-4
ii libflac8 1.2.1-6
ii libgcc1 1:4.7.2-4
ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.26.1-1
ii libglib2.0-0 2.33.12+really2.32.4-3
ii libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 1.0.5-1
ii libgstreamer1.0-0 1.0.5-1
ii libiec61883-0 1.2.0-0.1
ii libjack-jackd2-0 [libjack-0.116] 1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-5
ii libjpeg8 8d-1
ii liborc-0.4-0 1:0.4.16-2
ii libpng12-0 1.2.49-3
ii libraw1394-11 2.0.9-1
ii libshout3 2.2.2-8
ii libsoup-gnome2.4-1 2.38.1-2
ii libsoup2.4-1 2.38.1-2
ii libspeex1 1.2~rc1-7
ii libstdc++6 4.7.2-4
ii libtag1c2a 1.7.2-1
ii libv4l-0 0.8.9-1
ii libvpx1 1.1.0-1
ii libwavpack1 4.60.1-3
ii libx11-6 2:1.5.0-1
ii libxdamage1 1:1.1.3-2
ii libxext6 2:1.3.1-2
ii libxfixes3 1:5.0-4
ii libxv1 2:1.0.7-1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13
Versions of packages gstreamer1.0-plugins-good recommends:
ii gstreamer1.0-x 1.0.5-1
gstreamer1.0-plugins-good suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.0.8-1
On Di, 2013-05-07 at 15:04 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> On Di, 2013-05-07 at 10:22 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> > reassign 697955 gst-plugins-base1.0
> > found 697955 1.0.7-1
> > forwarded 697955 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699804
> > thanks
> >
> > On Fr, 2013-01-11 at 23:08 +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> > > Package: gstreamer1.0-plugins-good
> > > Version: 1.0.5-1
> > > Severity: normal
> > > Tags: upstream
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I don't know which of the many packages is actually decoding the file,
> > > so feel free to reassign the bug to gstreamer1.0-plugins-{ugly,bad}.
> > >
> > > I have this broadcast wav with an embedded MP3 file:
> > >
> > > http://adi.loris.tv/broken.wav
> > >
> > > Plays fine in gstreamer-0.10 but stutters with 1.0.x. I'd say this
> > > qualifies as a regression, but it's certainly upstream.
> > >
> > > How to proceed? Do you guys have good connections to upstream to forward
> > > this bug report? If need be, I could file one myself, but I don't have a
> > > gnome bug account and don't really want one.
> >
> > Thanks for reporting this and sorry for noticing this bug report only
> > now :(
> > I've debugged this a bit and forwarded it upstream:
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699804
>
> This is fixed upstream now and we'll get the fix with the 1.0.8 release.
And fixed in version 1.1.2-1 in experimental and 1.0.8-1
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
