Your message dated Mon, 23 Sep 2013 19:26:01 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#348797: refblas3: nonsensical Provides
has caused the Debian Bug report #348797,
regarding refblas3: nonsensical Provides
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
348797: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348797
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: refblas3
Version: 1.2-8
Severity: normal

refblas3 does

  Provides: libblas.so.3

This in nonsensical on Debian; we do not have file depends, nor any
tradition for such naming of library packages. What you probably meant
to say is

  Provides: libblas3

Actually, the package should be renamed into libblas3, as per Policy;
you might want to keep the Provides: refblas3 for compatibility if
that's required :-)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.3
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages refblas3 depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-11   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

refblas3 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Le jeudi 19 janvier 2006 à 01:21 +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson a écrit :
> Package: refblas3
> Version: 1.2-8
> Severity: normal
> 
> refblas3 does
> 
>   Provides: libblas.so.3
> 
> This in nonsensical on Debian; we do not have file depends, nor any
> tradition for such naming of library packages. What you probably meant
> to say is
> 
>   Provides: libblas3
> 
> Actually, the package should be renamed into libblas3, as per Policy;
> you might want to keep the Provides: refblas3 for compatibility if
> that's required :-)

The second part of the report is now fixed, since the shared library
package is now called "libblas3".

Concerning the Provides, I agree that "libblas.so.3" is not a common
name, but AFAIK such a naming is not forbidden either, and it is
self-explanatory. This Provides is used also by the other BLAS
implementations (ATLAS, OpenBLAS), and changing it would involve a
quasi-transition, for a benefit which is at most cosmetic. I am
therefore closing this bug, but feel free to reopen if you still think
this is a bug (and not just a cosmetic issue).

Cheers,

-- 
 .''`.    Sébastien Villemot
: :' :    Debian Developer
`. `'     http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
  `-      GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to