Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:27:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line cp fails for some xfs versions
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 20:56:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 13:56:51 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.enyo.de [212.9.189.167]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BSiyg-0000rM-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 13:56:51 -0700
Received: (debugging) helo=deneb ip=212.9.189.171 name=deneb.enyo.de
Received: from deneb.enyo.de ([212.9.189.171] helo=deneb)
by mail.enyo.de with esmtp id 1BSiye-0000AB-Gd
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 May 2004 22:56:48 +0200
Received: from fw by deneb with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BSg9L-0000Za-L8; Tue, 25 May 2004 19:55:39 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: coreutils: "cp -rp" fails on some XFS versions
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.59
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 19:55:39 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: coreutils
Version: 5.0.91-2
Severity: normal
With XFS 1.1, "cp -rp" fails when it tries to propagate access control
lists to new directories.
Here's an excert from copying an empty directory "a" to the
(non-existing) directory "b", using "copy -rp a b".
open("a", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=6, ...}) = 0
fcntl64(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0
getdents64(3, /* 2 entries */, 4096) = 48
getdents64(3, /* 0 entries */, 4096) = 0
close(3) = 0
utimes("b", {1085507262, 0}) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not implemented)
utime("b", [2004/05/25-19:47:42, 2004/05/25-19:47:26]) = 0
chown32("b", 1000, 1000) = 0
llistxattr("a", (nil), 0) = 0
llistxattr("a", 0xbffff1b0, 0) = 0
getxattr("a", "system.posix_acl_access", 0xbffff0f0, 132) = -1 ENODATA (No data
available)
stat64("a", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=6, ...}) = 0
setxattr("b", "system.posix_acl_access", 0x8056560, 28, ) = 0
getxattr("a", "system.posix_acl_default", 0xbffff0f0, 132) = -1 ENODATA (No
data available)
stat64("a", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=6, ...}) = 0
stat64("b", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=6, ...}) = 0
setxattr("b", "system.posix_acl_default", 0x8056418, 4, ) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid
argument)
write(2, "cp: ", 4cp: ) = 4
write(2, "preserving permissions for `b\'", 30preserving permissions for `b') =
30
write(2, ": Invalid argument", 18: Invalid argument) = 18
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (800, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
Versions of packages coreutils depends on:
ii libacl1 2.2.23-1 Access control list shared library
ii libattr1 2.4.16-1 Extended attribute shared library
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 250929-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2005 19:27:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 13 11:27:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.46])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EbNVL-0007ai-0y
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:27:07 -0800
Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([70.108.64.202])
by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep
9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:27:06 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C8B606646 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:27:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (osgiliath [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 21217-04-5 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,
13 Nov 2005 14:27:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8CC3160049B; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:27:05 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:27:05 -0500
From: Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cp fails for some xfs versions
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-disposition: inline
X-Pgp-Fingerprint: 53 FF 38 00 E7 DD 0A 9C 84 52 84 C5 EE DF 7C 88
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at mathom.us
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
I can't duplicate this. Feel free to reopen if it can be duplicated. It
could have been a bug in a particular xfs version from quite a while
back.
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
