Your message dated Thu, 2 Jan 2014 17:04:29 +0000 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#732676: flashplugin-nonfree: Please leave the "nosse2" option has caused the Debian Bug report #732676, regarding flashplugin-nonfree: Please leave the "nosse2" option to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 732676: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732676 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: flashplugin-nonfree Version: 1:3.4 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream Dear Maintainer, After update I noticed flash website weren't working; I tried with: # update-flashplugin-nonfree --install Version 11.2.202.332 needs sse2 and this system doesn't have that. It's ok, but when I give: # update-flashplugin-nonfree --nosse2 --install It complains about option "--nosse2" I looked at the changelog and one of the points is: * Removed option nosse2. Please leave this option, if possible, to allow automatically install/update of flash plugin; manual intervention is always possible. Thanks. Francesco -- Package-specific info: Debian version: jessie/sid Architecture: i386 Package version: 1:3.4 MD5 checksums: 208968bb1109e8627fa3c08b43814bee /var/cache/flashplugin-nonfree/get-upstream-version.pl 37d99a0fdad1e8da7834a3d586d5b607 /var/cache/flashplugin-nonfree/install_flash_player_10_linux.tar.gz 8793bf636c58c6a273cbf008e0f73e7e /var/cache/flashplugin-nonfree/install_flash_player_11_linux.i386.tar.gz 946f25a67c1bab8c170d786429b00f8d /var/cache/flashplugin-nonfree/install_flash_player_11_linux_i386.tar.gz md5sum: /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so: No such file or directory Alternatives: update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for flash-mozilla.so ls: cannot access /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flash-mozilla.so: No such file or directory /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flash-mozilla.so: ERROR: cannot open `/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flash-mozilla.so' (No such file or directory) -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages flashplugin-nonfree depends on: ii binutils 2.23.91.20131123-1 ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.52 ii gnupg 1.4.15-1.1 ii libatk1.0-0 2.10.0-2 ii libcairo2 1.12.16-2 ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.34.0-1 ii libfontconfig1 2.11.0-2 ii libfreetype6 2.5.1-1 ii libgcc1 1:4.8.2-5 ii libglib2.0-0 2.36.4-1 ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.22-1 ii libnspr4 2:4.10.2-1 ii libnss3 2:3.15.3.1-1 ii libpango1.0-0 1.36.0-1+b1 ii libstdc++6 4.8.2-5 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.2-1 ii libxext6 2:1.3.2-1 ii libxt6 1:1.1.4-1 ii wget 1.14-5 flashplugin-nonfree recommends no packages. Versions of packages flashplugin-nonfree suggests: pn flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound <none> ii fonts-dejavu 2.33+svn2514-3 ii hal 0.5.14-8 ii iceweasel 17.0.10esr-1~deb7u1 ii konqueror-nsplugins 4:4.11.3-1 ii ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.5 ii ttf-xfree86-nonfree 4.2.1-3.1 -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---tags 732676 wontfix tags 732676 - moreinfo stop On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:34:25AM +0100, Martintxo wrote: > I find in this blog post from Adobe, that only the 11.2 and newer versions of > flash player will be supported :-/ (until february 2017) > http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/02/adobe-and-google-partnering-for-flash-player-on-linux.html > > But you can maintain the 10.3 too and put a warning saying that it hasn't > security support !!. I'm afraid that I choose to only support Flash Players in flashplugin-nonfree that have security support by Adobe, therefor I'm closing this bug now. The good thing is that you have found a solution for yourself, so you can still use 10.3 on your hardware. Regards, Bart Martens
--- End Message ---
