Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:02:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331549: fixed in stax 1.0-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 22:41:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 15:41:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from poulet.zoy.org [80.65.228.129] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EMZ07-0002Fv-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 15:41:39 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by poulet.zoy.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927EDB2587;
        Tue,  4 Oct 2005 00:41:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from poulet.zoy.org ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (poulet [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id 22898-08; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 00:41:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from poukram (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by poulet.zoy.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B884B24D0;
        Tue,  4 Oct 2005 00:41:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by poukram (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 6DE1F95F5A; Tue,  4 Oct 2005 00:41:17 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Sam Hocevar (Debian packages)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: please rebuild stax
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:41:17 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at zoy.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: stax
Version: 1.0-11
Severity: normal

   Hello. Stax is one of the two packages still to depend on the old
liballegro4a package. Can you please rebuild it so that it links with
the newer liballegro4.1 library? I briefly tested the game and could
see no problem with the new library version.

   Also, c++-compiler is listed in the build dependencies, but it does
not seem to be needed at all.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-mm1
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages stax depends on:
ii  liballegro4a                  2:4.0.3-14 portable library for cross-platfor
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-6    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

stax recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 331549-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2005 00:04:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 13 16:04:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EbRnZ-0004Rs-Uh; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:02:13 -0800
From: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#331549: fixed in stax 1.0-13
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:02:13 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: stax
Source-Version: 1.0-13

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
stax, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

stax_1.0-13.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/stax/stax_1.0-13.diff.gz
stax_1.0-13.dsc
  to pool/main/s/stax/stax_1.0-13.dsc
stax_1.0-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/stax/stax_1.0-13_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated stax package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:23:33 +0100
Source: stax
Binary: stax
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 stax       - collection of puzzle games similar to Tetris Attack
Closes: 331549
Changes: 
 stax (1.0-13) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * yet another recompiled against a new Allegro version, this time really
     uploaded and so closes: #331549. Set Build-Depends on liballegro4.2-dev.
Files: 
 7cfd759460ed9e7a65a9e5133911673c 562 games optional stax_1.0-13.dsc
 43ce562f0a65c115ec2cd0ae12936678 3168 games optional stax_1.0-13.diff.gz
 418fe0b0f2b4771544cc6a3f86ed1a18 564956 games optional stax_1.0-13_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDd9Cg4QZIHu3wCMURAkXbAJ9MyDwHpOJWg61BQ8+0T/yyJvEqAwCeKkZ9
3LgYqdxCWszujkExQ3dZfOY=
=ZsWV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to