Your message dated Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:22:04 -0800
with message-id
<CACZd_tAmYwE3j5i4hG+h3065DWMjiqN=w8s1gdvhpbkdck8...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: sauerbraten: priority should be optional not extra
has caused the Debian Bug report #693438,
regarding sauerbraten: priority should be optional not extra
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
693438: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693438
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sauerbraten
Version: 0.0.20100728.dfsg+repack-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
i think the priority of client, server and data package should be
optional whereas the -dbg package is installed with the correct
priority "extra".
I've recognized this issue yesterday when i discovered a debcheck
warning which reminded me that sauerbraten-wake6 must not depend on
packages with a lower priority like sauerbraten.
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=sauerbraten-wake6
See also
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities
Cheers,
Markus
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.0.20100728.dfsg+repack-3
The current version in unstable is already marked priority: optional
(with the debug package being priority: extra).
Vincent
--- End Message ---
