Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:21:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line library renaming due to changed libstdc++ configuration
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:56:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:56:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ebuje-0006tg-Vh
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:56:07 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25222
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:05 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70E4F212
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:04 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 29850-21 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:04 +0100 (MET) 13913
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:04 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6u4OB008908
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:04 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:04 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: labplot
Severity: important
Please do not take any action before reading
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html
This bug report is filed against the source package which builds
a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing
*mt_alloc* symbols. The package has to be rebuilt with either
g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer). Please rename the
library package to a name with a "c2a" suffix, and adjust the build
dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist.
Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this
bug report.
If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with
a short reasoning.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 339191-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2005 14:25:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 16 06:25:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bueno.cs.tu-berlin.de
([130.149.23.253] helo=mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EcODo-0002RC-7F; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:25:12 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA11676;
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:21:35 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FACF20C;
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:21:35 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 24128-14; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:21:23 +0100 (MET) 11250
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:21:23 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAGELN69027316;
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:21:23 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:21:23 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: library renaming due to changed libstdc++ configuration
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Christopher Martin writes:
> On November 14, 2005 06:14, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > List of source packages with libraries, which need to be renamed:
> >
> > Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > regina-normal
> > Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > gwenview
> > Debian KDE Extras Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > digikam
> > Enrique Robledo Arnuncio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > rosegarden4
> > =A0 =A0Helen Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0labplot
> > Murat Demirten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > sim
>=20
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but these packages depend on kdelibs, and th=
us as=20
> during the gcc-4.0 transition, shouldn't need to have their libs rena=
med.=20
> They have to be rebuilt to find the new kdelibs4c2a anyway.
>=20
> Note that I only glanced at the list provided to spot KDE-based packa=
ges; I=20
> did not perform a thorough survey, so there may be others in this cat=
egory.
>=20
> It might be good to send follow-up notes to the bugs filed against th=
ese=20
> packages clarifying the situation, just so that maintainers don't mak=
e=20
> unnecessary changes.
closing these reports, because the libraries directly depend on kdelibs=
4c2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
