Your message dated Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:17:00 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339507: Processed: Re: coreutils: postinst should call 
install-info with absolute path
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2005 19:24:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 16 11:24:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from server.theo.chemie.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.122.133])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EcSt2-0007nZ-7g
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:24:04 -0800
Received: by castor.theo.chemie.tu-muenchen.de (Postfix, from userid 557)
        id 627ED1414C; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:23:31 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:23:31 +0100
From: Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: coreutils: postinst should call install-info with absolute path
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: coreutils
Version: 5.93-3
Severity: normal

Hi,

just had a support problem in #debian regarding upgrading coreutils in
unstable.  The postinst failed, it turned out the user had another,
incompatible, install-info (from TeXlive) installed in /usr/local/bin.
As the install-info call in coreutils' postinst does not specify a path,
this one got called rather than the one in dpkg, making it choke on the
--section arguments:

20:07 < rdrs> azeem: output is 'No such file or directory for Basics',
        same as before

As several install-info are circulating (albeit not in Debian), I think
it would be alright to make sure /usr/sbin/install-info is called, to
prevent coreutils from not upgrading. 


cheers,

Michael

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 339507-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 2005 17:16:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 18 09:16:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net ([64.62.161.42] ident=postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Ed9qm-0006Ju-Io
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:16:36 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (101-178-dial.xtn.net [66.118.101.178])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
        (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
        by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF5518173;
        Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:16:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 6CF5DBF52C; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:17:01 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:17:00 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#339507: Processed: Re: coreutils: postinst should call 
install-info with absolute path
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 06:18:22AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrot=
e:
> >># Reopening and reassigning to debhelper, where it should have been
> >># filed in the first place. =20
>=20
> Fine. Don't CC me on it next time.
>=20
> >># I still think this is a reasonable thing to
> >># do,=20
>=20
> I still think it's stupid. If the user puts something called "dpkg" in
> /usr/local/sbin that isn't compatible with the real dpkg that'll cause
> things to break also. We *can not* fix that problem, and special casing
> certain programs is madness and only encourages further misguided
> efforts of this sort.

I agree, and I will not use absolute paths in my programs. Closing.

--=20
see shy jo

--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDfgyMd8HHehbQuO8RAtPyAJ9Z6WpoxVH8s1MteXDvgO4VFiXOOACgwebG
p1+grh8+hMEeaq/UHdLvxAw=
=rOSv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to