Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298088: fixed in gdb 6.3.90.20051119-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Mar 2005 15:55:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 04 07:55:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from server.theo.chemie.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.122.133] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D7F9M-00067b-00; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 07:55:36 -0800
Received: by xserver.theo.chemie.tu-muenchen.de (Postfix, from userid 557)
        id B5B719A350; Fri,  4 Mar 2005 16:55:03 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:55:03 +0100
From: Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends on gcj-3.3
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gdb
Version: 6.3-5
Severity: important

There was a problem building your package:

Automatic build of gdb_6.3-5 on beethoven by sbuild/hurd-i386 1.170.5
Build started at 20050304-1610
******************************************************************************
Checking available source versions...
Fetching source files...
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Need to get 17.5MB of source archives.
Get:1 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main gdb 6.3-5 (dsc) [845B]
Get:2 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main gdb 6.3-5 (tar) [17.4MB]
Get:3 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main gdb 6.3-5 (diff) [150kB]
Fetched 17.5MB in 27s (641kB/s)
Download complete and in download only mode
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: autoconf, libtool, texinfo (>= 4.7-2.2), tetex-bin,
libncurses5-dev, libreadline4-dev (>= 4.2a-1), bison, gettext, debhelper
(>= 4.1.46), dejagnu, gcj [!mips !mipsel], gobjc, mig [hurd-i386], cdbs
(>= 0.4.17), quilt (>= 0.30-1), libkvm-dev [kfreebsd-i386],
type-handling (>= 0.2.1), libunwind7-dev [ia64], flex | flex-old
[...]
Checking for source dependency conflicts...
  /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install
autoconf libncurses5-dev libreadline4-dev dejagnu gcj gobjc mig cdbs
quilt type-handling flex
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  gcj: Depends: gcj-3.3 (>= 1:3.3.5-1) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
apt-get failed.
Package installation failed
Trying to reinstall removed packages:
Trying to uninstall newly installed packages:
Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping gdb
******************************************************************************
Finished at 20050304-1611

As gdb is pretty important, please add hurd-i386 to the list of
architectures not Build-Depending (or otherwise using) gcj for the time
being. 

We plan to look into having gcj around eventually, but nobody is working
on it currently and (AFAIK) there are some issues which prevent it to
just being switched on right now.


thanks,

Michael

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 298088-close) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2005 19:41:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 20 11:41:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Eduv4-0002rK-Jr; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:32:10 -0800
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#298088: fixed in gdb 6.3.90.20051119-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:32:10 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6

Source: gdb
Source-Version: 6.3.90.20051119-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gdb, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gdb_6.3.90.20051119-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gdb/gdb_6.3.90.20051119-1.diff.gz
gdb_6.3.90.20051119-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gdb/gdb_6.3.90.20051119-1.dsc
gdb_6.3.90.20051119-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gdb/gdb_6.3.90.20051119-1_i386.deb
gdb_6.3.90.20051119.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gdb/gdb_6.3.90.20051119.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gdb package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:40:44 -0500
Source: gdb
Binary: gdb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 6.3.90.20051119-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 gdb        - The GNU Debugger
Closes: 261330 293637 298088 306267 309538 317317 320391 323217 326358 328580 
332184
Changes: 
 gdb (6.3.90.20051119-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream snapshot (6.4 branch prerelease).
     - Many Debian patches merged.
     - Selected frame and C++ pass-by-reference patches updated.
     - Fixes segfault when executing malformed TUI window commands
       (Closes: #317317).
     - Behaves more gracefully when the executable disappears, et cetera
       (Closes: #293637, #323217, #332184).
     - Handle vfork from threaded programs using NPTL (Closes: #320391).
   * Do not rebuild bfd.info.
   * Build depend on a version of debhelper which will put menu fils
     in /usr/share.
   * Don't build depend on gcj on the Hurd (Closes: #298088).
   * Prevent unnecessary SIGTTOU when resolving pending breakpoints
     (Closes: #306267).
   * Enable the testsuite on amd64.
   * Use libreadline5 instead of libreadline4 (Closes: #309538, #326358).
   * Install gdb_gcore.sh as gcore (Closes: #328580).
   * Add GPC support (Closes: #261330).
Files: 
 85efb361d8a541dc8b97de99328d36ba 1328 devel standard gdb_6.3.90.20051119-1.dsc
 45eb316dbe9707a7d3d9a6876810cfc5 19098755 devel standard 
gdb_6.3.90.20051119.orig.tar.gz
 22209abda56bd21458667345b87e388e 39594 devel standard 
gdb_6.3.90.20051119-1.diff.gz
 ac0dd81e033ae31ae474dbb013187594 2755846 devel standard 
gdb_6.3.90.20051119-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDgMr8bgOPXuCjg3cRAlDQAJ9zZpAPVvXIaz2yBeEGoNSMbSwMzACeM9Wh
f2itNxL8eNKs5iLT58y28qE=
=L9L2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to