Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:35:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in recent uploads of manpages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2005 06:06:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 23:06:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pcp0010743271pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net
(pcp0010744200pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net) [69.243.84.108]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DQfgQ-0003iE-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:06:02 -0700
Received: from orthrus ([192.168.0.2])
by pcp0010744200pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 1DQfid-00058u-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 02:08:19 -0400
Received: from furrm by orthrus with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DQfgP-0006CW-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 02:06:01 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: epoll_ctl(2) description differs from implementation
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 02:06:01 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: manpages-dev
Version: 2.02-1
Severity: normal
The epoll_ctl(2) man page states that when using the op parameter
EPOLL_CTL_DEL, "The event is ignored and can be NULL". However, if
epoll_ctl is passed a value of NULL in its event paramter in this
case, it returns EFAULT (which is also not listed as a possibility
in the ERRORS section).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages manpages-dev depends on:
ii manpages 2.02-1 Manual pages about using a GNU/Lin
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 306517-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Nov 2005 16:35:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 22 08:35:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.57])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eeb7Q-0005wp-VB; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:35:45 -0800
Received: from andromeda (cpe-69-202-136-66.twcny.res.rr.com [69.202.136.66])
by ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
jAMGZep4000353;
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:35:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1Eeb7L-0004Nh-M7; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:35:39 -0500
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:35:39 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Kerrisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: fixed in recent uploads of manpages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8
Version: 2.09-1
These bugs are all reported fixed by the upstream manpages maintainer,
Michael Kerrisk. For my own convenience, I'm marking them all as
"fixed by version 2.09-1", even though some of them are fixed by
earlier uploads. The bug number, correct fixed-in version, and title
are listed below:
#317037 2.06 Difficult to understand in sscanf RETURN VALUE
#315411 2.09 New upstream release: 2.09
#209323 2.09 please include pty(4) manpage
#330877 2.09 read can return EINVAL when using O_DIRECT and buffer not aligned
#321131 2.08 exit.3 missing "is"
#299795 2.07 Some library functions' manpage use wrong hyphen
#295666 2.03 regex.7.gz: The word boundary regexps are unsupported
#326520 2.08 'man msgget' typo: one line not displayed
#306517 2.04 epoll_ctl(2) description differs from implementation
#291121 2.04 flock(2) second time by same process
#323851 2.08 getpwnam.3 manpage should clarify the scope of pw_dir
#323062 2.08 clone(2) CLONE_PARENT_SETTID description incorrect
#101433 2.04 "man setitimer" give bad informations
#113812 2.04 libc6-dev: iconv prototype
#317037 2.06 Difficult to understand in sscanf RETURN VALUE
#219695 2.04 sysconf(3): describes _SC_2_DEV, which doesn't exist
#294890 2.03 Typo in wait(2): "watpid"
--
Clear skies,
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
