Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:03:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #266415: [NONFREE-DOC:OPL] wdg-html-reference is not DFSG free
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2004 20:25:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 17 13:25:13 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from home.aurel32.net (farad.aurel32.lan) [82.228.90.9]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BxAW8-00063w-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:25:13 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 22:24:39 +0200
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at aurel32.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Subject: wdg-html-reference is not DFSG free
Package: wdg-html-reference
Severity: serious
Justification: DFSG
Tags: sarge-ignore
debian-legal has recently reconsidered the Open Publication License
and has determined that it is a license that is not free. See:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/03/msg00226.html
It appears that your package is using data under that license. So you
could either:
1) persuade the upstream author to change the license
2) move the package to non-free
3) could ask the package to be removed
Anyway, documentation licence issues are not being considered RC for
sarge, that's why the bug is tagget as Sarge ignore. That's let you some
time to persuade the upstream author :)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 266415-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Nov 2005 17:03:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 22 09:03:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from farad.aurel32.net ([82.232.2.251])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EebYj-0002bP-Ut
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:03:58 -0800
Received: from bode.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:211:9ff:feed:c498])
by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1EebYi-0001C0-2r
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:03:56 +0100
Received: from aurel32 by bode.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EebYh-0003NO-QX
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:03:55 +0100
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:03:55 +0100
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: #266415: [NONFREE-DOC:OPL] wdg-html-reference is not DFSG free
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.11 (2005-09-15)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
The package has been removed from the archive. Closing the bug.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
