Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2014 07:49:01 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#738952: fixed in tahoe-lafs 1.10.0-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #738952,
regarding tahoe-lafs: Incorrect dependency python-pycryptopp (>= 0.5.29) 
version (>= 0.6.0 required)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
738952: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738952
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tahoe-lafs
Version: 1.10.0-1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

I've just tried to upgrade to tahoe-lafs 1.10-1 in Sid from the previous 
1.9.2-1 in Wheezy. Apparently, all
the dependencies were met, and the package installed without trouble.

However, when trying to create an introducer/storage/client, it seems like 
python-pycryptopp version required
is at least 0.6.0 (instead of 0.5.29 as stated). Please check this error 
message:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/tahoe", line 3, in <module>
    from allmydata.scripts import runner
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/allmydata/__init__.py", line 380, in 
<module>
    check_all_requirements()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/allmydata/__init__.py", line 378, in 
check_all_requirements
    raise PackagingError(get_error_string(errors, debug=True))
allmydata.PackagingError: 
PackagingError: We require pycryptopp >= 0.6.0, but could only find version 
0.5.29.
The version we found is from '/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages'.
To resolve this problem, uninstall that version, either using your
operating system's package manager or by moving aside the directory.

For debugging purposes, the PYTHONPATH was
  None
install_requires was
  ['setuptools >= 0.6c6', 'zfec >= 1.1.0', 'simplejson >= 1.4', 'zope.interface 
== 3.6.0, == 3.6.1, == 3.6.2, >= 3.6.5', 'Twisted >= 11.0.0', 'foolscap >= 
0.6.3', 'pyOpenSSL', 'Nevow >= 0.6.0', 'pycrypto == 2.1.0, == 2.3, >= 2.4.1', 
'pyasn1 >= 0.0.8a', 'mock >= 0.8.0', 'pycryptopp >= 0.6.0']
sys.path after importing pkg_resources was
  /usr/bin:
  /usr/lib/python2.7:
  /usr/lib/python2.7/plat-linux2:
  /usr/lib/python2.7/lib-tk:
  /usr/lib/python2.7/lib-old:
  /usr/lib/python2.7/lib-dynload:
  /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages:
  /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages:
  /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7


Regards,

Roger


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.4
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages tahoe-lafs depends on:
ii  net-tools              1.60-24.2
ii  python                 2.7.3-4+deb7u1
ii  python-crypto          2.6-4+deb7u3
ii  python-foolscap        0.6.4-1
ii  python-mock            0.8.0-3
ii  python-nevow           0.10.0-4
ii  python-openssl         0.13-2+deb7u1
ii  python-pkg-resources   0.6.24-1
ii  python-pyasn1          0.1.3-1
ii  python-pycryptopp      0.5.29-1
ii  python-setuptools      0.6.24-1
ii  python-simplejson      2.5.2-1
ii  python-twisted         12.0.0-1
ii  python-zfec            1.4.5-2
ii  python-zope.interface  3.6.1-3

tahoe-lafs recommends no packages.

tahoe-lafs suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tahoe-lafs
Source-Version: 1.10.0-1.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tahoe-lafs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan <[email protected]> (supplier of updated 
tahoe-lafs package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:57:05 +0530
Source: tahoe-lafs
Binary: tahoe-lafs
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.10.0-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Bert Agaz <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan <[email protected]>
Description: 
 tahoe-lafs - Secure distributed filesystem
Closes: 738952
Changes: 
 tahoe-lafs (1.10.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * debian/control: tahoe-lafs needs pypcryptopp version 0.6.0 or above,
     else it gives a run-time error. (Closes: #738952)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 30a33e688a607c4e1857a9bfe00c4f4842b54657 1952 tahoe-lafs_1.10.0-1.1.dsc
 970a1b46c8559cbaf6f533a4d88d46c9dede55a8 14584 
tahoe-lafs_1.10.0-1.1.debian.tar.xz
 33d705b494bfd12bbe9506ebe8f1d76f690926c6 1006270 tahoe-lafs_1.10.0-1.1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 e825fedb48e117e230a811cf7cad8b91ebc30fcd6fc98e3f17eb50f45d871e84 1952 
tahoe-lafs_1.10.0-1.1.dsc
 e8c45597b06a8a73fa5e97500919a7519b188cfdb8b94cc51b02c4e53edd7121 14584 
tahoe-lafs_1.10.0-1.1.debian.tar.xz
 1ac3dedfd436cf2e09da0490605bf15a61ebf839feda5c8fe9395a5096c33038 1006270 
tahoe-lafs_1.10.0-1.1_all.deb
Files: 
 13cc1b3d12e20d9b387df5c245c22326 1952 utils optional tahoe-lafs_1.10.0-1.1.dsc
 4bb767a4d171132a8d971892b21573a2 14584 utils optional 
tahoe-lafs_1.10.0-1.1.debian.tar.xz
 e6c1cb2ce711a3eb1e5af6bec870fc68 1006270 utils optional 
tahoe-lafs_1.10.0-1.1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=9gOl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to