Your message dated Mon, 28 Nov 2005 06:47:55 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339486: fixed in psad 1.4.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2005 16:40:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 16 08:40:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx1.magmacom.com ([206.191.0.217])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EcQKH-00076l-Eh
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:40:01 -0800
Received: from mail1.magma.ca (mail1.magma.ca [206.191.0.252])
        by mx1.magmacom.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jAGGdxJj028140;
        Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:40:00 -0500
Received: from reykjavik (ottawa-hs-64-26-147-81.d-ip.magma.ca [64.26.147.81])
        by mail1.magma.ca (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jAGGdwvZ029028
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
        Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:39:59 -0500
Received: from fmarier by reykjavik with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1EcQKD-0003oL-CG; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:39:57 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Francois Marier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: psad: Freenode's proxyscan needs to be whitelisted
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:39:57 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: psad
Version: 1.4.3-1
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

I started receiving reports of port scans being performed by Freenode's
open proxy scanner.  That in itself is a good thing since psad is
supposed to be detecting all of those.  However I believe that a lot of
Debian users (irc is not unpopular a lot of us) would prefer not to be
notified whenever freenode scans their machine.

The following line in /etc/psad/auto_dl will ignore all traffic from the
Freenode proxy scan:

  82.96.96.0/24   0; # please.read.http.proxyscan.freenode.net

I'm not sure what the default should be, but it would be nice if that
line was at least commented-out in /etc/psad/auto_dl with an explanation
like "Uncomment the next line to ignore the Freenode open proxy scan".

Also, a note in README.Debian might be useful since the purpose of the
"auto_dl" file is not immediately obvious from the filename (I was
looking for something like "whitelist").

Thanks,

Francois

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 339486-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2005 14:51:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 28 06:51:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EgkIN-0003FN-H2; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 06:47:55 -0800
From: Daniel Gubser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#339486: fixed in psad 1.4.4-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 06:47:55 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: psad
Source-Version: 1.4.4-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
psad, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

psad_1.4.4-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/psad/psad_1.4.4-1.diff.gz
psad_1.4.4-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/psad/psad_1.4.4-1.dsc
psad_1.4.4-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/psad/psad_1.4.4-1_i386.deb
psad_1.4.4.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/psad/psad_1.4.4.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Gubser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated psad package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 14:49:53 +0100
Source: psad
Binary: psad
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Gubser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Daniel Gubser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 psad       - The Port Scan Attack Detector
Closes: 339486
Changes: 
 psad (1.4.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   * added proxyscan.freenode.net to auto_dl (Closes: #339486)
Files: 
 0c3deed42f89ffd96ecca63800c9f357 546 admin optional psad_1.4.4-1.dsc
 6cae2812e016ebb0c30a4815844059c8 671256 admin optional psad_1.4.4.orig.tar.gz
 1b4b10517028524ebd83193e86f9a4be 41977 admin optional psad_1.4.4-1.diff.gz
 db90324096f62b63849632f53b866213 240580 admin optional psad_1.4.4-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDixQFNgbFFFW/0CQRAmeAAJ951fLww6E/WnuqMZjnKV/+hjMAOgCfaTOk
e2O9wPJKIAxHozo2fVSX/5E=
=Vbre
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to