Your message dated Sat, 05 Jul 2014 16:19:04 +0000 with message-id <1537117.F39aML7SD4@bastien-debian> and subject line Done: lintian: Possible mis-classification license-problem-non-free-RFC has caused the Debian Bug report #748686, regarding lintian: Possible mis-classification license-problem-non-free-RFC to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 748686: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748686 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: lintian Version: 2.5.22.1 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, while test-packaging "bgpmon"[0] lintian raised, among other things, the error | E: bgpmon source: license-problem-non-free-RFC doc/xml/xml2rfc-1.33/rfc2629.html However, RFC 2629 is listed in the known exceptions[2] so I guess that's a false-positive that should be reported as requested. If you need my preliminary Debianisation for a reproducer, drop me a line. Also note I've abandoned the plan to maintain this package, severity lowered therefore. For the same reason I'm perfectly fine with whatever you think is appropriate to deal with lintian's behaviour. Christoph [1] http://bgpmon.netsec.colostate.edu/ http://bgpmon.netsec.colostate.edu/download/src/bgpmon-7.3.4.tar.bz2 [2] https://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.10.39 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages lintian depends on: ii binutils 2.24.51.20140425-1 ii bzip2 1.0.6-5 ii diffstat 1.58-1 ii file 1:5.18-1 ii gettext 0.18.3.2-1 ii hardening-includes 2.5 ii intltool-debian 0.35.0+20060710.1 ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.29+b1 ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.37-2 ii libclass-accessor-perl 0.34-1 ii libclone-perl 0.36-1 ii libdpkg-perl 1.17.9 ii libemail-valid-perl 1.192-1 ii libfile-basedir-perl 0.03-1 ii libipc-run-perl 0.92-1 ii liblist-moreutils-perl 0.33-2 ii libparse-debianchangelog-perl 1.2.0-1 ii libtext-levenshtein-perl 0.06~01-2 ii libtimedate-perl 2.3000-2 ii liburi-perl 1.60-1 ii man-db 2.6.7.1-1 ii patchutils 0.3.3-1 ii perl [libdigest-sha-perl] 5.18.2-2+b1 ii t1utils 1.37-2 Versions of packages lintian recommends: pn libperlio-gzip-perl <none> ii perl-modules [libautodie-perl] 5.18.2-2 Versions of packages lintian suggests: pn binutils-multiarch <none> ii dpkg-dev 1.17.9 ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.71-1+b1 ii libtext-template-perl 1.46-1 ii libyaml-perl 0.84-1 ii xz-utils 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2 -- no debconf information
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Package: lintian Version: 2.5.24 According to help o this item, you should override the tag in case of dual licensing. In this case the file is dual licensed so override please. Bastien
--- End Message ---
