Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 16:18:44 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#723195: fixed in base-files 7.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #723195,
regarding base-files: Update FAQ with info about licenses
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
723195: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723195
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: base-files
Version: 7.2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

Hello,

the base-files FAQ refers to a sentence about licenses that does not
appear any more in the Debian policy. The following patch updates that
sentence and suggests the reader to have a look at the discussion of
bug #620674 for more details.

Regards,

--
Gioele Barabucci
 

diff -ur base-files/base-files-7.2/debian/README 
base-files.new/base-files-7.2/debian/README
--- base-files/base-files-7.2/debian/README     2012-12-12 11:00:00.000000000 
+0000
+++ base-files.new/base-files-7.2/debian/README 2013-09-17 09:01:50.382857000 
+0000
@@ -67,13 +67,16 @@
 
 A. I delegate such decisions to the policy group. If you want to
 propose a new license you should make a policy proposal to modify the
-paragraph in policy saying "Packages distributed under the UCB BSD
-license, Artistic license, GNU GPL and GNU LGPL should refer to the
-files in /usr/share/common-licenses". The way of doing this is
+paragraph in policy saying "For certain common free software licenses
+([...]), you can just refer to the appropriate file in the
+/usr/share/common-licenses/ directory". The way of doing this is
 explained in the debian-policy package. As usual, you should always
 take a look at already reported bugs against debian-policy before
 submitting a new one.
 
+Note 1: The discussion in bug #620674 describes under which conditions
+a license can be considered common enough to be included.
+
 Q. I upgraded from woody to sarge. Should my system be FHS-compliant now?
 
 A. Achieving FHS compliance by upgrading would be tricky and prone to

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: base-files
Source-Version: 7.4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
base-files, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> (supplier of updated base-files package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 18:00:08 +0200
Source: base-files
Binary: base-files
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 7.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Santiago Vila <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Santiago Vila <[email protected]>
Description: 
 base-files - Debian base system miscellaneous files
Closes: 723195 753658 754455
Changes: 
 base-files (7.4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Updated FAQ to match current policy wording about common-licenses.
     Thanks to Gioele Barabucci for the report. Closes: #723195.
   * Moved /etc/os-release to /usr/lib/os-release. Put a symlink pointing to
     the new place. Thanks to Marco d'Itri for the report. Closes: #753658.
   * Changed BUG_REPORT_URL in os-release to https, as the BTS has moved.
     Thanks to Martin Zobel-Helas for the report. Closes: #754455.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 3718ba78be996755f1bd03b24f2f38db6fbc2a1f 1018 base-files_7.4.dsc
 04c9cacf156f24fe9df969ff6283052f7bf4ed75 74192 base-files_7.4.tar.gz
 9882ca15e07db387c54ed499afba0e9a993ed33c 76158 base-files_7.4_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 4ed9c3405313d3a3333ea9398b4d8964780f223e56cab97d07fae889a72d0126 1018 
base-files_7.4.dsc
 5ca3c02eaa64335a2150421af5c0d30e9fad7fabb7a6b963fb0fee32d52b2105 74192 
base-files_7.4.tar.gz
 310a00a111d5f7e9bfd98b72a32a82c108af551dd333211dea61e69ba027cc45 76158 
base-files_7.4_amd64.deb
Files: 
 811c2d1a19f7bc9db7d73ce08b97d273 1018 admin required base-files_7.4.dsc
 67d587d5f95b4d752463a7a339167110 74192 admin required base-files_7.4.tar.gz
 a9f8145f7025eff06e2282e2ed3ad02c 76158 admin required base-files_7.4_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTyphkAAoJEEHOfwufG4syk/sIAKpJGnR1YPWBY/qUKbO/Q3S8
ubheeqp4Bl2t0w7n3ZgZF1CZ6PxAUsKqzPZjh2ILd+9hDizkxQorwH68pfDgRB/H
8TDxhP0lnBPQ7x79iQwV7scTCn9eLaoe+Thcnx36tJxzZ3l2K7D4eUikSqF0q8+h
r0bKtZ1Pbuxr7kOA1ZTlf6+tsVl8qKTqT5qoHP5HZKS/qGFlAvnouH+bzSZ6dwAq
d/NEIkYZbCKHVF61r0s9xueaZN8oQkFUdRspnBx7SVPEqEufpEghr1peHCYjS5tr
MpEiR3j3q5NieOkk9XWSdB+MUv3/D8Pz7J0gP1KwyGlwm9UQM1DSOqqVz6gYoPE=
=d5yM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to