Your message dated Fri, 2 Dec 2005 09:24:24 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341725: aptitude: A General Issue with many Debian packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2005 15:58:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 02 07:58:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from www.gregfolkert.org ([66.80.246.91] helo=knight.gregfolkert.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EiDJG-00041W-Hh
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 07:58:54 -0800
Received: from greg by knight.gregfolkert.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EiDIg-0000be-I5
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 10:58:18 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: aptitude: A General Issue with many Debian packages
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 10:58:18 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.2.15.9-2
Severity: normal
Thanks to you for such a well done program. It pales in comparison to most
other console based package
management applications.
The mere fact it has so many bugreports tells me it is widely used and very
popular, but still a work in
progress, which BTW is the reason I am opening this bug.
Thanks to you Dan for making heads or tales of everything, and for those things
you have done that have
no percieved benefit for the user, but make the life of a Debian User and
Developer more pleasant, even
when all you hear is complaints.
This is One(1) Atta-Person (formerly Atta-Boy), for which there is no reward
other than getting it.
Which I hope is received well upon you.
Cheers, and Thanks for all your effort and work. (Spare time is expensive you
now)
greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3 0.5.28.6 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-13 GCC support library
ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libsigc++-1.2-5c102 1.2.5-4 type-safe Signal Framework for C++
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-13 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 341725-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2005 17:42:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 02 09:42:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.vzavenue.net ([66.171.59.140])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EiEv7-0000RS-Ej
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 09:42:05 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain (244.173.171.66.subscriber.vzavenue.net
[66.171.173.244])
by smtp.vzavenue.net (MOS 3.7.1-GA)
with ESMTP id DIS33070;
Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:24:25 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 09:24:24 -0800
From: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#341725: aptitude: A General Issue with many Debian packages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Junkmail-Status: score=0/50, host=smtp.vzavenue.net
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 10:58:18AM -0500, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t> was heard to say:
> Thanks to you for such a well done program. It pales in comparison to mos=
t other console based package
> management applications.
>=20
> The mere fact it has so many bugreports tells me it is widely used and ve=
ry popular, but still a work in
> progress, which BTW is the reason I am opening this bug.
>=20
> Thanks to you Dan for making heads or tales of everything, and for those =
things you have done that have
> no percieved benefit for the user, but make the life of a Debian User and=
Developer more pleasant, even
> when all you hear is complaints.
>=20
> This is One(1) Atta-Person (formerly Atta-Boy), for which there is no rew=
ard other than getting it.
> Which I hope is received well upon you.
>=20
> Cheers, and Thanks for all your effort and work. (Spare time is expensive=
you now)
Reading this again, I guess it's just meant to be a thank-you message.
Which is nice, but isn't really a bug. Closing.
A mail to the Maintainer address would work just as well, and wouldn't
make the bug list even worse than it is.
Daniel
--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDkINIch6xsM7kSXgRAjAQAJ9/f2IXiu5PJB11mzAG50zT78aGqgCgh3Yc
eCe8jrkCIbDHW9UAwWU9GjM=
=9lbW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ibTvN161/egqYuK8--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
