Your message dated Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:21:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330216: krb5-admin-server: kadmind does not fork
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Sep 2005 19:29:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 26 12:29:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from outback.rfc2324.org (mail.rfc2324.org) [212.227.20.41]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EJyfh-0001mL-00; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:29:53 -0700
Received: from p548b7892.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.139.120.146]
helo=bigmonster.home.cybernoia.de)
by mail.rfc2324.org with esmtpsa rfc2324.org Mailserver (Exim 4.50)
id 1EJyff-000129-MX; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:29:51 +0200
Received: by bigmonster.home.cybernoia.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 82646227737; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:29:49 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andre Landwehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: krb5-admin-server: kadmind does not fork
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:29:49 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: krb5-admin-server
Version: 1.3.6-2
Severity: normal
The kadmind does not fork/detach, neither from command line nor from init
script. A trivial fix is to append --background to the start-stop-server, but a
"real" fix would be better of course.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stable
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 330216-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2005 04:21:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 02 20:21:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.stanford.edu ([171.67.16.123])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EiOtY-0001tM-7o
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:21:08 -0800
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147])
by smtp1.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jB34L6CM012866
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 20:21:07 -0800
Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C152AE7946; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 20:21:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#330216: krb5-admin-server: kadmind does not fork
Organization: The Eyrie
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:21:06 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 1.4.3-2
> The kadmind does not fork/detach, neither from command line nor from
> init script. A trivial fix is to append --background to the
> start-stop-server, but a "real" fix would be better of course.
I don't know if this is something that's been fixed in the latest release
(I don't see anything in ChangeLog about it and it looks like it was done
long ago...), but it certainly forks and detaches for me. Looking at the
source, it calls daemon(0, 0), which is an excellent way to do the right
thing.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
