Your message dated Mon, 05 Dec 2005 14:32:21 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342143: fixed in kernel-package 10.015
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2005 19:38:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 05 11:38:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from p54a7de6c.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.167.222.108] 
helo=localhost.localdomain)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EjMAf-00010M-3f
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:38:46 -0800
Received: from bennett by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.60)
        (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
        id 1EjMA8-0006el-It; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:38:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
From: Ruben Porras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernel-package: Error setting debconf flags in generated linux image
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:38:12 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
        HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.012
Severity: normal

dpkg -i linux-image-2.6.15-rc5kprobes_2.6.15-rc5kprobes-10.00.Custom_i386.deb
(Lese Datenbank ... 250348 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit
installiert.)
Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von linux-image-2.6.15-rc5kprobes
2.6.15-rc5kprobes-10.00.Custom (durch
linux-image-2.6.15-rc5kprobes_2.6.15-rc5kprobes-10.00.Custom_i386.deb)
...
Gtk-WARNING **: Theme directory scalable/emblems of theme Flat-Blue has
no size field
Entpacke Ersatz für linux-image-2.6.15-rc5kprobes ...
Richte linux-image-2.6.15-rc5kprobes ein
(2.6.15-rc5kprobes-10.00.Custom) ...
Using mkinitrd.yaird to build the ramdisk.
Not updating initrd symbolic links since we are being
updated/reinstalled
(2.6.15-rc5kprobes-10.00.Custom was configured last, according to dpkg)
Not updating image symbolic links since we are being updated/reinstalled
(2.6.15-rc5kprobes-10.00.Custom was configured last, according to dpkg)
Error setting debconf flags in
linux-image-2.6.15-rc5kprobes/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.15-rc5kprobes:
Unsupported command "you" (full line was "You already have a LILO
configuration in /etc/lilo.conf") received from confmodule. at
/var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.15-rc5kprobes.postinst line 1190,
<STDIN> line 3.
dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von linux-image-2.6.15-rc5kprobes
(--install):
 Unterprozess post-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 128 zurück
 Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von:
  linux-image-2.6.15-rc5kprobes
  
The command used to generate that kernel image was

make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd --append-to-version=kprobes
kernel_image modules_image

Thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages kernel-package depends on:
ii  dpkg                         1.13.11.0.1 package maintenance system for Deb
ii  dpkg-dev                     1.13.11     package building tools for Debian
ii  file                         4.15-2      Determines file type using "magic"
ii  gcc [c-compiler]             4:4.0.2-1   The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-2.95 [c-compiler]        1:2.95.4-24 The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-3.3 [c-compiler]         1:3.3.6-10  The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-3.4 [c-compiler]         3.4.5-1     The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-4.0 [c-compiler]         4.0.2-5     The GNU C compiler
ii  gettext                      0.14.5-2    GNU Internationalization utilities
ii  make                         3.80-11     The GNU version of the "make" util
ii  perl                         5.8.7-8     Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  po-debconf                   0.9.0       manage translated Debconf template

Versions of packages kernel-package recommends:
ii  bzip2                         1.0.2-11   high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev]          2.3.5-8.1  GNU C Library: Development Librari

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 342143-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2005 22:41:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 05 14:41:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EjOsf-0006Mz-G5; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 14:32:21 -0800
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#342143: fixed in kernel-package 10.015
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 14:32:21 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: kernel-package
Source-Version: 10.015

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kernel-package, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

kernel-package_10.015.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kernel-package/kernel-package_10.015.dsc
kernel-package_10.015.tar.gz
  to pool/main/k/kernel-package/kernel-package_10.015.tar.gz
kernel-package_10.015_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kernel-package/kernel-package_10.015_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated kernel-package 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  5 Dec 2005 15:43:33 -0600
Source: kernel-package
Binary: kernel-package
Architecture: source all
Version: 10.015
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 kernel-package - A utility for building Linux kernel related Debian packages.
Closes: 342143
Changes: 
 kernel-package (10.015) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Bug fix: "kernel-package: Error setting debconf flags in generated
     linux image", thanks to Ruben Porras. Darn. Don't emit messages to
     STDOUT, we are now using debconf, which gets all confused. (Closes: 
#342143).
Files: 
 e508beef3d6710daa5cbaf27ae0d11ee 485 misc optional kernel-package_10.015.dsc
 5f92f75eaed1d9c658fc53657ff1e3cb 753104 misc optional 
kernel-package_10.015.tar.gz
 a53793786f8facfa72eeebaf89842365 512788 misc optional 
kernel-package_10.015_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDlLbtIbrau78kQkwRAsacAJ428OPMQt1zR5Yq2LwcHes/yD5YtQCeJfqs
9JiiMgKLxtU6CjMFbjgyhc4=
=n+XW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to