Your message dated Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:33:39 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#764553: fixed in base-files 7.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #764553,
regarding base-files: Does neither state which version nor which variant of the
Artistic License is in /usr/share/common-licenses/Artistic
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
764553: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764553
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: base-files
Version: 7.5
Severity: important
Dear Santiago,
neither inside /usr/share/common-licenses/Artistic nor in
/usr/share/doc/base-files/README nor in
/usr/share/doc/base-files/changelog.gz is declared (or even hinted)
which version or variant of "The Artistic License" is shipped in
/usr/share/common-licenses/Artistic.
According to https://spdx.org/licenses/ there are at least five
registered versions and variants of the Artistic License:
* Artistic License 1.0
* Artistic License 1.0 (Perl)
* Artistic License 1.0 w/clause 8
* Artistic License 2.0
* Clarified Artistic License
According to "dwdiff -c", our /usr/share/common-licenses/Artistic is
actually the "Artistic License 1.0 (Perl)" license.
Please clearly state inside the file but also in the README which
version and variant of the Artistic License is shipped with the package.
A bit of background about some of the variants and versions is at
http://opensource.org/licenses/Artistic-1.0 as well as at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artistic_License
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (600, 'testing'), (110, 'experimental'), (109,
'buildd-unstable'), (109, 'buildd-experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.16-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages base-files depends on:
ii gawk [awk] 1:4.1.1+dfsg-1
ii mawk [awk] 1.3.3-17
base-files recommends no packages.
base-files suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: base-files
Source-Version: 7.6
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
base-files, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> (supplier of updated base-files package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 20:27:00 +0200
Source: base-files
Binary: base-files
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 7.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Santiago Vila <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Santiago Vila <[email protected]>
Description:
base-files - Debian base system miscellaneous files
Closes: 758246 764553
Changes:
base-files (7.6) unstable; urgency=low
.
* By default, when the computer is booting, green and red colors are used
to signal that a service started successfully, or that it did not.
In this context, trying to use colors for something else might be
misleading or even confusing. For this reason, I'm dropping
ANSI_COLOR from /usr/lib/os-release. Closes: #758246.
* Clarified in the copyright file that the Artistic License currently
in common-licenses is actually the one coming from Perl. Closes: #764553.
Checksums-Sha1:
f9d5695e6cf4ae35aea573b770000166405a72e1 1006 base-files_7.6.dsc
5eff8ba08aa62db65addfddc8328a03079c60373 52056 base-files_7.6.tar.xz
96410d23011d56ca2fcda031793a20217f54124e 76820 base-files_7.6_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
50f19c079b43f450bfbda6845c827a292ea8b779d1f26f3fff3c3d114c180459 1006
base-files_7.6.dsc
2a0ec07309dfdd1e2f1c4295a2c68a7d86b1820d337a8572b4632a652384586a 52056
base-files_7.6.tar.xz
c8d3ecd3afd006704dcc1b35d2b62ba648dbe19b41f9bb5d3ea64c1fe006459a 76820
base-files_7.6_amd64.deb
Files:
a91302ca35df7894170af103d6c5b80a 76820 admin required base-files_7.6_amd64.deb
607ba5664d7153249903ae06ec7f901f 1006 admin required base-files_7.6.dsc
a0ac077475b9362b5ae201490ccce693 52056 admin required base-files_7.6.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUNtOWAAoJEEHOfwufG4sy8fEH/A8CAsKQJtZ9rimK+AO7BhH1
igv+L2UBg4uwcR4DuRlIFP8T1YQApNcGLnLA6zQDDsT+UgQekJRyePpbpSs2OY7D
4Ogwfb41G2N3TCxU+48+QQHAeUgYc0K+E+jqbno1zINyCGEw/8GizTuk44fYrntc
t+B04YyjGP4ZdJCQSP+JohKmfNYF00sazIrAbx3LrlpJ1ADw+HgwFyE+pdTG13c6
8PpSCoN3TVBCibrJHRlT6t0UEPUXFKEzgORzC/ZeO2ODAIXQU/uONtNlCDuQC+2k
iT7sKEulsYB6OyqKc4MHjmVth/0A/sT6NnHB2TaHwXP1XIdztiZ84qdkX0UtoRg=
=yMBt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
