Your message dated Sat, 1 Nov 2014 17:13:25 +0100
with message-id
<CAEeZ+JQR=gnfeMJVSB=jusobjtbal24w9ignvxyoatjr+bx...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#763351: new upstream version available
has caused the Debian Bug report #763351,
regarding new upstream version available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
763351: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763351
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: smuxi
Severity: wishlist
It seems the debian archive only has a RC5, while upstream really
released 0.11 properly. Is there something I am missing?
https://smuxi.im/news/smuxi_0.11_release/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.16-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Antoine Beaupré <[email protected]> wrote:
> Source: smuxi
> Severity: wishlist
>
> It seems the debian archive only has a RC5, while upstream really
> released 0.11 properly. Is there something I am missing?
>
Smuxi 0.11~rc5 is 0.11 final, see:
https://github.com/meebey/smuxi/compare/0.11-rc5...0.11
--
Best regards,
Mirco 'meebey' Bauer
FOSS Developer [email protected] https://www.meebey.net/
Debian Developer [email protected] http://www.debian.org/
GNOME Foundation Member [email protected] http://www.gnome.org/
PGP-Key ID 0xEEF946C8 https://meebey.net/pubkey.asc
--- End Message ---
