Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:16:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#153126: Fixed in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2002 06:20:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 16 01:20:21 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from barbados.bluemug.com [63.195.182.101] (person)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 17ULh5-0001Ru-00; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 01:20:19 -0500
Received: from fiji.bluemug.com ([192.168.50.32])
        by barbados.bluemug.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1)
        id 17ULh1-0002gD-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 23:20:15 -0700
Received: from mayotte.bluemug.com ([192.168.50.64] ident=foobar)
        by fiji.bluemug.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1)
        id 17ULgz-00087S-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 23:20:13 -0700
Received: from miket by mayotte.bluemug.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1)
        id 17ULgz-0002rn-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 23:20:13 -0700
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 23:20:13 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: llseek(2) erroneously cites 2GB ext2 file size limit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-PGP-ID: 5C09BB33
X-PGP-Fingerprint: C518 67A5 F5C5 C784 A196  B480 5C97 3BBD 5C09 BB33
From: Mike Touloumtzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: manpages-dev
Version: 1.39-1.1

The BUGS section of llseek(2) contains this text:

       The  ext2 filesystem does not support files with a size of
       2GB or more.

In fact, the ext2 filesystem never had a file size limitation--the
limitation was in the Linux kernel VFS layer, and was removed in 2.4
kernels (but is still present in 2.2) and glibc 2.2.

The actual ext2 file size limit depends on the filesystem blocksize as
follows:

ext2 with 1 KiB blocksize       16448 MiB (~ 16 GiB)
ext2 with 2 KiB blocksize       256 GiB 8192 GiB (= 8 TiB)
ext2 with 4 KiB blocksize       2048 GiB (= 2 TiB)

Also, there are many filesystems besides ext2 so it doesn't make sense
to refer specifically to ext2 here.

I suggest changing the manpage text to:

BUGS
        Linux kernels older than 2.4.0-test7 do not support files
        with a size of 2GB or more.

For more details see http://www.suse.de/~aj/linux_lfs.html

thanks,
miket

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 153126-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 14:16:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 06:16:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EmAxN-0001DC-43
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:16:41 -0800
Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (popix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de 
[129.206.119.235])
        by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBDEGcc7014185
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:16:38 +0100
Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de 
[129.206.100.140])
        by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA7307346
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:16:38 +0100
Received: from live (p54A70E77.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.167.14.119])
        (authenticated bits=0)
        by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 
jBDEHHdL026227
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:17:18 +0100
Received: from fernst by live with local (Exim 4.60)
        (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
        id 1EmAxJ-0005vE-13
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:16:37 +0100
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:16:36 +0100
From: Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#153126: Fixed in sid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cs5saTBZh7UZl2eX"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
        HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--cs5saTBZh7UZl2eX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: manpages-dev
Version: 1.44-1

On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 01:53:09 +0000, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> This bug has been fixed in sid (and sarge, which has the same version of
> the package).

Indeed, the offending text isn't present in any revision in the
infodrom CVS, so I guess this bug could simply be closed for 1.44-1.

HTH,
Flo

--cs5saTBZh7UZl2eX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDntfEs3U+TVFLPnwRAlzXAJ0br5TAH8LzEIc5WOFG8QjzG+IpeACggd8n
V0SChTkxOQQKr8owa6DClDg=
=Zsj4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cs5saTBZh7UZl2eX--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to