Your message dated Wed, 26 Nov 2014 22:26:20 +0000
with message-id
<capq4b8kmgcnqnagkcvehnqqyfaqvw16f8+ct_wd7grxadzf...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: more information about orphan and old gcc-4.2 bug reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #488869,
regarding [gcc-4.2] alpha-only compilation failure with -fPIC and relocation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
488869: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=488869
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc-4.2
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,
python-qt4 fails on alpha [0] with the following error:
g++ -shared -Wl,--version-script=QtGui.exp -o QtGui.so sipQtGuipart0.o
sipQtGuipart1.o sipQtGuipart2.o sipQtGuipart3.o sipQtGuipart4.o sipQtGuipart5.o
sipQtGuipart6.o sipQtGuipart7.o sipQtGuipart8.o sipQtGuipart9.o
sipQtGuipart10.o sipQtGuipart11.o sipQtGuipart12.o sipQtGuipart13.o
sipQtGuipart14.o sipQtGuipart15.o sipQtGuipart16.o sipQtGuipart17.o
sipQtGuipart18.o sipQtGuipart19.o sipQtGuipart20.o sipQtGuipart21.o
sipQtGuipart22.o sipQtGuipart23.o sipQtGuipart24.o sipQtGuipart25.o
sipQtGuipart26.o sipQtGuipart27.o sipQtGuipart28.o sipQtGuipart29.o
sipQtGuipart30.o sipQtGuipart31.o sipQtGuipart32.o sipQtGuipart33.o
sipQtGuipart34.o sipQtGuipart35.o sipQtGuipart36.o sipQtGuipart37.o
sipQtGuipart38.o sipQtGuipart39.o -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lQtGui -lQtCore
sipQtGuipart28.o:/build/buildd/python-qt4-4.4.2/dbg-build-2.4/QtGui/sipQtGuipart28.cpp:173:
relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against symbol `sipAPI_QtGui' defined in
.sbss section in sipQtGuipart0.o
sipQtGuipart28.o:/build/buildd/python-qt4-4.4.2/dbg-build-2.4/QtGui/sipQtGuipart28.cpp:173:
relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against symbol `sipNm_QtGui_count'
defined in .sdata section in sipQtGuipart0.o
sipQtGuipart28.o:/build/buildd/python-qt4-4.4.2/dbg-build-2.4/QtGui/sipQtGuipart28.cpp:178:
relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against symbol
`sipModuleAPI_QtGui_QtCore' defined in .sbss section in sipQtGuipart0.o
sipQtGuipart28.o:/build/buildd/python-qt4-4.4.2/dbg-build-2.4/QtGui/sipQtGuipart28.cpp:2542:
relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against symbol `sip_QtGui_qt_metaobject'
defined in .sbss section in sipQtGuipart0.o
sipQtGuipart28.o: In function `meth_QFormLayout_sender':
/build/buildd/python-qt4-4.4.2/dbg-build-2.4/QtGui/sipQtGuipart28.cpp:3040:
relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against symbol `sipAPI_QtGui' defined in
.sbss section in sipQtGuipart0.o
sipQtGuipart28.o: In function `meth_QFormLayout_sender':
/build/buildd/python-qt4-4.4.2/sip/QtCore/qobject.sip:463: relocation truncated
to fit: GPREL16 against symbol `sipAPI_QtGui' defined in .sbss section in
sipQtGuipart0.o
sipQtGuipart28.o: In function `meth_QFormLayout_sender':
/build/buildd/python-qt4-4.4.2/dbg-build-2.4/QtGui/sipQtGuipart28.cpp:3055:
relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against symbol `sipAPI_QtGui' defined in
.sbss section in sipQtGuipart0.o
/build/buildd/python-qt4-4.4.2/dbg-build-2.4/QtGui/sipQtGuipart28.cpp:3055:
relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against symbol `sipNm_QtGui_sender'
defined in .sdata section in sipQtGuipart0.o
sipQtGuipart28.o: In function `forceConvertTo_QFontDatabase':
/build/buildd/python-qt4-4.4.2/dbg-build-2.4/QtGui/sipQtGuipart28.cpp:12230:
relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against symbol `sipAPI_QtGui' defined in
.sbss section in sipQtGuipart0.o
/build/buildd/python-qt4-4.4.2/dbg-build-2.4/QtGui/sipQtGuipart28.cpp:12232:
relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against symbol `sipAPI_QtGui' defined in
.sbss section in sipQtGuipart0.o
sipQtGuipart28.o: In function `forceConvertTo_QFontDialog':
/build/buildd/python-qt4-4.4.2/dbg-build-2.4/QtGui/sipQtGuipart28.cpp:7603:
additional relocation overflows omitted from the output
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [QtGui.so] Error 1
This is the debug part of the build, the normal build (with -O1) works just
fine. The man page says that -fPIC automatically
enables -mlarge-data, and thus GPREL32 instead of GPREL16.
best,
Torsten
[0]
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=python-qt4;ver=4.4.2-3;arch=alpha;stamp=1214932614
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.25.4-shl1
Debian Release: lenny/sid
500 unstable www.debian-multimedia.org
500 unstable ftp.de.debian.org
500 experimental www.debian-multimedia.org
1 experimental ftp.de.debian.org
--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=====================================-+-=====================
gcc-4.2-base (= 4.2.4-2+b1) |
cpp-4.2 (= 4.2.4-2+b1) |
binutils (>= 2.17cvs20070426) | 2.18.50.20080507-1
libgcc1 (>= 1:4.2.4-2+b1) | 1:4.3.1-3
libc6 (>= 2.7-1) | 2.7-12
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
2012-11-18 15:46 GMT+00:00 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
<[email protected]>:
> tags 458746 + moreinfo
> tags 488869 + moreinfo
> tags 530901 + moreinfo
> stop
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for the detailed bug report and your interest in improving
> Deiban. I'm just doing some cleanup, I am not a maintainer of the GCC
> package in Debian. (You will have to CC me if you want me to receive
> possible replies).
>
> The package name of these bug reports is not present in Debian, and
> the bug is orphan now (without assigned package/maintainer), which it
> means that, even if not closed, people probably will not pay any
> attention to it anymore (it will have to be reassigned to a package
> name in active releases).
>
> According to the following URL, the package was removed from official
> repositories back in 2009:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gcc-4.2.html
>
> I cannot try to reproduce these bugs myself with current versions of
> GCC, since I don't have access to machines with these architectures.
>
> Can you reproduce the bug, or do you think that the bug might be still
> present? If so, we should reassign the bug to the current package
> names. Or otherwise, can we close the bug report?
Since the package gcc-4.2 was removed ~5 years ago, the bug reports
are orphan (not assigned to any maintainer/package) and didn't see any
activity for more than 2 years (after the last messsage above), I
think that it makes sense to close the reports now.
Please reassign against the relevant packages present nowadays in the
archive, if the issues are still present.
Regards.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <[email protected]>
--- End Message ---
