Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:06:43 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 0.8.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2004 08:01:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 08 01:01:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from homer.w3.org [128.30.52.30]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C4xOn-0006cb-00; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 01:01:49 -0700
Received: from buena (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by homer.w3.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689054EEEC;
Wed, 8 Sep 2004 04:01:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by buena (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1EC4013AD8; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:36:43 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:36:43 +0200
From: Hugo Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: irssi-text: Glib output to stderr garbles output
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AhhlLboLdkugWU4S"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.63
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: irssi-text
Version: 0.8.9-1
Severity: normal
Hi.
I noticed that Glib error messages are sent to stderr and garble
Irssi's display.
For example, trying opening an SSL connection to a closed port, I get
plenty of the following:
(process:26163): GLib-CRITICAL **: file giochannel.c: line 142
(g_io_error_get_from_g_error): assertion `err !=3D NULL' failed
Those are sent to stderr and not nicely displayed by Irssi, which
forces me to do a screen refresh with ^L.
The work-around I found is to redirect stderr to /dev/null, but I
think that Irssi should just either hide those messages or handle them
as CLIENTCRAP or CLIENTNOTICES (having a quick look at Glib, I'm not
sure it's possible), or close stderr itself which I think is fine.
Regards,
Hugo
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)
Versions of packages irssi-text depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii libglib2.0-0 2.4.6-2 The GLib library of C routines
ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal =
hand
ii libperl5.8 5.8.4-2 Shared Perl library.
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7d-4 SSL shared libraries
ii perl 5.8.4-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extract=
ion=20
ii perl-base [perlapi-5.8.2] 5.8.4-2 The Pathologically Eclectic Ru=
bbis
-- no debconf information
--=20
Hugo Haas - http://larve.net/people/hugo/
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBQT62i6N/9WeKWvkNAQGBaAP/QUTeXasa7AjkGOXg66ANvdPw91hUpECH
8ppQqYG9VWUiVt/l9kvxxndS+6tbiJGtXjF+Poi98XVjcjUFg4oSX3SrQLKdzJgb
Fi7GKJWOGnN6aMpTznr2KDMK76ngLh0jC6Xz0jzKazxLskKM3fVw8DLEfAhTfitA
RxFqnMG3vqE=
=fdGb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 270596-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2005 09:06:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 15 01:06:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from light.bluelinux.co.uk ([193.201.200.221] ident=postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Emp4W-0000lf-Ec
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:06:44 -0800
Received: from light.bluelinux.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by light.bluelinux.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BEEE4479F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:06:43 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by light.bluelinux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 2042)
id 0C81AE5B327; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:06:43 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:06:43 +0000
From: David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in 0.8.10
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This has been fixed in 0.8.10
--
David Pashley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
