Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:17:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342507: fixed in stunnel4 2:4.140-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2005 05:11:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 07 21:11:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from speedy.labeltools.net ([212.227.81.159] helo=mail.labeltools.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EkE4H-0004QS-TF
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 21:11:46 -0800
Received: by mail.labeltools.net (Postfix, from userid 115)
id 0CD84E28572D; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 06:11:14 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Torsten Behrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: stunnel4: wrong stunntel4 debian config - fails to start
Reply-To: Torsten Behrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 06:11:13 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: stunnel4
Version: 2:4.140-2
Severity: normal
Hello,
the debian configuration does not work fine with the current package.
It needs some extra settings, so that it successfull starts:
1) run as stunnel user - not nobody
2) correct chroot path /var/run/stunnel4
3) logfile is not set to /var/log/stunnel4/stunnel.log
Here the correct settings:
chroot = /var/run/stunnel4/
setuid = stunnel4
setgid = stunnel4
; PID is created inside chroot jail
pid = /stunnel.pid
; Some debugging stuff useful for troubleshooting
;debug = 7
output = /var/log/stunnel4/stunnel.log
best regards
Torsten Behrens
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages stunnel4 depends on:
ii adduser 3.79 Add and remove users and groups
ii libc6 2.3.5-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8a-3 SSL shared libraries
ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-8 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii netbase 4.23 Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii openssl 0.9.8a-3 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a
ii perl-modules 5.8.7-7 Core Perl modules
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime
stunnel4 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 342507-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2005 09:20:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 17 01:20:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EnYBk-0002JM-EX; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:17:12 -0800
From: Julien Lemoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#342507: fixed in stunnel4 2:4.140-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:17:12 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: stunnel4
Source-Version: 2:4.140-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
stunnel4, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
stunnel4_4.140-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/s/stunnel4/stunnel4_4.140-3.diff.gz
stunnel4_4.140-3.dsc
to pool/main/s/stunnel4/stunnel4_4.140-3.dsc
stunnel4_4.140-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/stunnel4/stunnel4_4.140-3_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Lemoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated stunnel4 package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:00:40 +0100
Source: stunnel4
Binary: stunnel4
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2:4.140-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julien Lemoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Julien Lemoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
stunnel4 - Universal SSL tunnel for network daemons
Closes: 342507
Changes:
stunnel4 (2:4.140-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Default configuration file is now filled with values for usage
in a chroot environment
(if you do not want chroot or want to use vserver, you need to edit it)
(Closes: #342507)
Files:
9eca20057d1f60d90f28d2b1b330c684 632 net optional stunnel4_4.140-3.dsc
56ad456e45237beb4770d80a4804d33a 23601 net optional stunnel4_4.140-3.diff.gz
3ae9f0bf0453b1f24d8c9522e66a43ad 93406 net optional stunnel4_4.140-3_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDo9TTc29c8N2YKnURAj66AJ9edlbBKlu02ba5XbrT6NIIdH4arACeNHgx
jN3Blxq9id+kVl6TVNk/KS8=
=LGch
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
