Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:28:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in rus-ispell 0.99f9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2005 05:53:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 22:53:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (myxomop.com) [69.55.233.8]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Daopd-00065X-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 22:53:29 -0700
Received: from nidd by myxomop.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Daono-0007vI-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 25 May 2005 01:51:36 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: peter novodvorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: aspell-ru: aspell archvhitecture is any
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 09:51:36 +0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: peter novodvorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: aspell-ru
Severity: important
aspell-ru's architecture is ``any''. it is caused by format of indexes
that aspell generate, itdepends on type size or big/little endian
issues.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-xenU
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 310667-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2005 11:29:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 17 03:29:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from piccolo.konflux.at ([81.223.134.180] helo=konflux.at)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EnaFK-00050q-G0; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 03:29:02 -0800
Received: from omena.intranet (dsl-hkigw7-fe12f900-46.dhcp.inet.fi
[84.249.18.46])
(using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by konflux.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872423EEAA;
Sat, 17 Dec 2005 12:28:29 +0100 (CET)
Subject: fixed in rus-ispell 0.99f9-3
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Martin-=C9ric?= Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-kXYcPBzRUVMm2joLeyOG"
Organization: Funkyware
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:28:26 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-kXYcPBzRUVMm2joLeyOG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
fixed in rus-ispell 0.99f9-3
--=20
Martin-=C3=89ric Racine
http://q-funk.iki.fi
--=-kXYcPBzRUVMm2joLeyOG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digitaalisesti allekirjoitettu viestin osa
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDo/ZaeXr56x4Muc0RAn7NAJ40bzMZBSpNhQcFLzTXPyp4f2uGEACdEAA5
z+vQ9Gi66nhmHZkBmvJc0mU=
=Gqer
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-kXYcPBzRUVMm2joLeyOG--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]