Your message dated Thu, 9 Apr 2015 18:06:07 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line wontfix+close
has caused the Debian Bug report #765572,
regarding Please provide a better upgrade process
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
765572: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765572
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Package: eatmydata
Version: 82-2
Severity: normal
The new eatmydata put the .so file to another location so while
upgrading the system, there will be many of the following error messages
when apt is run with eatmydata:
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libeatmydata/libeatmydata.so' from LD_PRELOAD
cannot be preloaded (cannot open shared object file): ignored.
The upgrade process should put a link in the old location and remove it
only if LD_PRELOAD is populated with the new location.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (800, 'unstable'), (110, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.15.10 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to
de_DE)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages eatmydata depends on:
ii libc6 2.19-11
eatmydata recommends no packages.
eatmydata suggests no packages.
- -- no debconf information
- --
Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen <[email protected]>
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=jbIN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags 765572 wontfix
I thought about it.
Really, it's something I don't want to support, it's just silly.
If people insists at using it, they can live with warnings.
if they really can't live with the whole apt output bloated they can upgrade
libeatmydata before the rest of the system, and then do the upgrade.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
