Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:39:36 -0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [debian-vrms] Bug#48152: yes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2001 22:10:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 07 17:10:32 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (murphy.debian.org) [::ffff:10.10.10.9]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1587z6-0000uz-00; Thu, 07 Jun 2001 17:10:32 -0500
Received: (qmail 3941 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2001 22:07:06 -0000
Received: from tomts14.bellnexxia.net (HELO tomts14-srv.bellnexxia.net)
(209.226.175.35)
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 7 Jun 2001 22:07:06 -0000
Received: from david.localdomain ([64.230.150.179])
by tomts14-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 7 Jun 2001 18:02:59 -0400
Received: from david by david.localdomain with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 1588oI-0008Og-00; Thu, 07 Jun 2001 18:03:26 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: vrms: If reasonable, vrms should report RealPlayer as non-free, if
fully installed.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "David B. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 18:03:26 -0500
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: vrms
Version: 1.6.1
Severity: normal
I think that vrms should be reporting the realplayer package as non-free, if
/usr/X11R6/bin/realplayer exists, or somesuch.
Only if it's reasonable to implement, though :)
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux david 2.4.5-xfs-b2 #1 Sat Jun 2 23:39:53 EST 2001 i686
unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 48152-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2005 02:40:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 18:40:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtpout9.uol.com.br ([200.221.4.200] helo=smtp.uol.com.br)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EoXQ9-00020k-Tn
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:40:10 -0800
Received: from dumont.rtb.ath.cx (unknown [200.221.104.251])
by scorpion3.uol.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2C77B2F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:39:38 -0200 (BRST)
Received: (qmail 32203 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Dec 2005 02:39:36 -0000
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:39:36 -0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rog=E9rio?= Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tretzm=FCller?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian vrms Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [debian-vrms] Bug#48152: yes
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tretzm=FCller?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian vrms Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hi, Thomas and other users.
On Nov 27 2005, Rog=E9rio Brito wrote:
> On Nov 27 2005, Thomas Tretzm=FCller wrote:
> > Hence the program doesn't get it right. It should probably do more
> > checks.
>=20
> Yes, it doesn't get it right.
(...)
> The right way would be to have the packaging of it properly done.
I guess that we can close this bug, as it isn't exactly a problem with
vrms, but with how some other packages are incorrectly prepared.
Please, reopen it (with a justification) if you think that it is indeed
a problem with vrms proper.
Regards, Rog=E9rio Brito.
--=20
Rog=E9rio Brito : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito
Homepage of the algorithms package : http://algorithms.berlios.de
Homepage on freshmeat: http://freshmeat.net/projects/algorithms/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
