Your message dated Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:15:53 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#760630: dpkg-buildpackage: when debian/rules is not
present and debhelper is in build-deps, run dh instead of debian/rules
has caused the Debian Bug report #760630,
regarding dpkg-buildpackage: when debian/rules is not present and debhelper is
in build-deps, run dh instead of debian/rules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
760630: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760630
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg-dev
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: Enrico Zini <[email protected]>
When debian/rules is not present and debhelper is in build-deps, please
have dpkg-buildpackage run dh $target instead of debian/rules $target.
For some packages, debian/rules is now pointless boilerplate that could
be removed if dpkg-buildpackage were to do this.
The CC to Enrico is due to his DebCon14 talk about debdry:
https://summit.debconf.org/debconf14/meeting/25/debdry-debian-dont-repeat-yourself/
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!
On Sat, 2014-09-06 at 14:14:40 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-09-06 at 16:03:38 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > Package: dpkg-dev
> > Severity: wishlist
> > X-Debbugs-CC: Enrico Zini <[email protected]>
> In any case this kind of thing, or even more radical changes to the
> source format, like having dpkg-dev provide much infrastructure, even
> simply pure declarative stuff, to make helpers either irrelevant, or
> maybe so that they could end up just providing distro specific policy,
> is something that would make sense to collect for a possible 4.0 source
> format. I could add a wiki page under the dpkg team umbrella.
While I think debdry is a nice prototype to show where we could get
to or an interim solution to reduce work, I do think the above is the
ideal way to go in the future.
> > The CC to Enrico is due to his DebCon14 talk about debdry:
> >
> > https://summit.debconf.org/debconf14/meeting/25/debdry-debian-dont-repeat-yourself/
>
> I've not watched that one yet, will do during next week or so, and see
> if it changes my mind (but I'm doubtful). ;)
I watched it several weeks ago, it was interesting. :)
> Otherwise I guess I'll be closing this in a bit.
Ok, doing so now.
Thanks,
Guillem
--- End Message ---
