Your message dated Mon, 25 May 2015 15:39:58 -0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#782718: perl-doc-html: outdated again
has caused the Debian Bug report #782718,
regarding perl-doc-html: outdated again
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
782718: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782718
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: perl-doc-html
Version: 5.18.2-1
This package is outdated: perl in jessie will be 5.20.2.
It's too late to update this for jessie, at least not
before the first point release.
Roberto: do you think it's still worth having this released or should
it rather be removed from testing? (The release is planned for 2015-04-25,
see https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/03/msg00016.html )
I note that pretty much everything in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=154963#21
concerning this package still applies.
--
Niko Tyni [email protected]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 5.20.1-1
Niko,
I have just uploaded version 5.20.1-1. However, I forgot to note the
closure of this bug in the changelog, so I am closing the bug with this
message. Also, I would like to note that it has been several years
since I have used Perl in a serious capacity and my (lack of) attention
to this package demonstrates that. I have also orphaned the package
with my most recent upload.
Regards,
-Roberto
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:15:37PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Package: perl-doc-html
> Version: 5.18.2-1
>
> This package is outdated: perl in jessie will be 5.20.2.
>
> It's too late to update this for jessie, at least not
> before the first point release.
>
> Roberto: do you think it's still worth having this released or should
> it rather be removed from testing? (The release is planned for 2015-04-25,
> see https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/03/msg00016.html )
>
> I note that pretty much everything in
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=154963#21
> concerning this package still applies.
> --
> Niko Tyni [email protected]
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
