Your message dated Sat, 30 May 2015 16:03:11 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#772034: plm lacks a dependency on jruby
has caused the Debian Bug report #772034,
regarding plm lacks a dependency on jruby
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
772034: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772034
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: plm
Version: 2.4.11+repack-2
Severity: normal

Hi.

AFAIU, plm requires jruby for Python (which seems a bit strange: ruby for 
python ?... anyway).

I think the package needs a dependency.

Hth.

Best regards,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), 
(500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages plm depends on:
ii  java-wrappers            0.1.28
ii  jython                   2.5.3-3
ii  libgettext-commons-java  0.9.6-2
ii  libhttpclient-java       4.3.5-2
ii  libhttpcore-java         4.3.3-1
ii  libhttpmime-java         4.3.5-2
ii  libjgit-java             3.4.0-2
ii  libjson-simple-java      1.1.1-2
ii  libmiglayout-java        4.2-1
ii  librsyntaxtextarea-java  2.5.0-1

plm recommends no packages.

plm suggests no packages.

-- debconf-show failed

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:21:12AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> Martin Quinson <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > We already have a Suggests: on jython. Should I raise it to a
> > Recommends: maybe? I didn't so far to not bother the ones using PLM in
> > Java.
> 
> Dunno what's best. At the time, I missed the suggests, it seems.

https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html

Recommends
    This declares a strong, but not absolute, dependency.
    The Recommends field should list packages that would be found
    together with this one in all but unusual installations.

Suggests
    This is used to declare that one package may be more useful with
    one or more others. Using this field tells the packaging system
    and the user that the listed packages are related to this one and
    can perhaps enhance its usefulness, but that installing this one
    without them is perfectly reasonable.
    
So I think that Suggests is fully adapted, and I will thus close the
bug report. There is a message in the console if you try to use python
without jython. It could be a swing dialog to be perfect, but I feel
that the current setting is sufficient for now, isn't it?

Feel free to reopen if you disagree.

Thanks for your interest,
Mt.

-- 
Le mode incognito peut vous protéger des gens qui vous veulent du mal,
mais pas de ceux qui vous veulent du bien, qui sont pourtant les plus
puissants et dangereux.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to