Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs closed with version 02.06-3 of lshw.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 12:14:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 05:14:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVTdS-0001qz-00; Tue, 10 May 2005 05:14:50 -0700
Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp
(return-path [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 1DVTdO-0005bf-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 May 2005 13:14:46 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 1DVTdO-0003uL-00; Tue, 10 May 2005 13:14:46 +0100
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 13:14:46 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lshw-common: architecture-independent?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: lshw-common
Version: 02.03-2
Is there any reason why lshw-common is Architecture: any? It seems to me
that it should be Architecture: all, and put together in 'debian/rules
binary-indep'.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 308473-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 18:16:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 10:16:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kabuto.elmundo.es ([193.110.128.11] helo=mail.elmundo.es)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EqDwq-0006qw-14; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:16:52 -0800
Received: from xanes.el-mundo.int (xanes.elmundo.int [10.5.222.50])
by mail.elmundo.es (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5ADDC34F4D; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix, from userid 65500)
id 425A817315; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 141C517313; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:49 +0100 (CET)
From: David =?iso-8859-1?q?Mart=EDnez_Moreno?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Debian
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bugs closed with version 02.06-3 of lshw.
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:47 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
Cc: Ghe Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart3495050.AaJzHcURVk";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.366930, version=0.10.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4
--nextPart3495050.AaJzHcURVk
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Version: 02.06-3
Hello, Ghe, sorry, I forgot to make the final run with -v02.03-1, so I
am=
=20
closing manually bugs closed with this upload.
Thank you for your contribution,
Ender.
=2D-=20
Network engineer
Debian Developer
--nextPart3495050.AaJzHcURVk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDrZCPWs/EhA1iABsRAgHhAJ9sJZEDUra/0lSptWDzDLDoWKushgCfYqNS
SYVIcFeLD8Nb9uQxZwPy+qQ=
=WNY5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart3495050.AaJzHcURVk--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
