Your message dated Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:46:38 +0100
with message-id 
<1435347998.3594600.308794777.29ec4...@webmail.messagingengine.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#790071: y-u-no-validate: please make the build 
reproducible
has caused the Debian Bug report #790071,
regarding y-u-no-validate: please make the build reproducible
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
790071: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790071
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: y-u-no-validate
Version: 2013052401-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: [email protected]
Usertags: umask
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]

Hi,

While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that y-u-no-validate could not be built reproducibly.

The attached patch removes umask variability from the build system by
using dh_install to actually install files. Once applied,
y-u-no-validate
can be built reproducibly in our reproducible toolchain.

 [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      [email protected] / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-
diff --no-dereference -urNad 
y-u-no-validate.orig/y-u-no-validate-2013052401/debian/rules 
y-u-no-validate/y-u-no-validate-2013052401/debian/rules
--- y-u-no-validate.orig/y-u-no-validate-2013052401/debian/rules        
2015-06-26 20:06:23.479856822 +0100
+++ y-u-no-validate/y-u-no-validate-2013052401/debian/rules     2015-06-26 
20:24:13.504339653 +0100
@@ -13,7 +13,8 @@
        dh_testroot
        dh_prep
        install-xpi -x 'test*' -x README -r debian/xul-ext-y-u-no-validate.xpi
-       cd debian/*/usr/share/xul-ext/*/chrome/ && unzip *.jar && rm *.jar
+       cd debian/*/usr/share/xul-ext/*/chrome/ && unzip -d 
$(CURDIR)/debian/chrome *.jar && rm *.jar
+       dh_install debian/chrome debian/*/usr/share/xul-ext/*/
        sed -i -e 's,y-u-no-validate[.]jar!/,,' -e 's/jar://' 
debian/*/usr/share/xul-ext/*/chrome.manifest
        dh_xul-ext
        dh_installdocs README
@@ -29,6 +30,7 @@
 .PHONY: clean
 clean: debian/control
        dh_clean
+       rm -rf debian/chrome
 
 here = $(dir $(firstword $(MAKEFILE_LIST)))/..
 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> I'm confused. According to reproducible.d.n[0], there is no difference 
> in permissions, only in timestamps.

Oh dear, I confused this with another package.. time for a nap. Sorry
for the noise..


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      [email protected] / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to