Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:20:35 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259328: Fixed?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 02:12:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 13 19:12:12 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from heffalump.snafu.priv.at [210.8.28.121]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BkZFj-00014j-00; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:12:11 -0700
Received: from heffalump.snafu.priv.at (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by heffalump.snafu.priv.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id
i6E28fdu032335
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:08:42 +1000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by heffalump.snafu.priv.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i6E28fSa032333;
Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:08:41 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Alexander Zangerl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: df: weird size miscalculations on sparc64
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:08:41 +1000
X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/0.16.253 (heffalump [210.8.28.121]); Wed, 14 Jul
2004 12:08:45 +1000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: fileutils
Version: 4.1-10
Severity: normal
this is an sun ultra1, with ext3 filesystems. /etc/fstab sets the type
explicitely, and no magic mounting options are used. POSIXLY_CORRECT is not
set.
df's output is totally broken if i run it without options (in one way),
or when it's run on a mountpoint without a trailing slash (but the output is
wrong in a different way). if i run df with a trailing slash on
the mountpoint, everything works again.
[az:~] df
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 -1324350 1 0 6% /
/dev/sda4 2461 485 1851 21% /usr
/dev/sda5 10606152 325480 9741896 4% /var
[az:~] df /
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 22146 1189 19832 6% /
[az:~] df //
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 1511856 81128 1353928 6% /
the last is correct. note that the percentages are always ok, just the
block counts are gaga. i've straced df, and statfs results are the same
always (and correct, too).
note: this installation has been cloned from a sparc32 system, where the
very same df program worked flawlessly.
the relevant strace output of a broken run for / follows:
write(1, "Filesystem 1k-blocks "..., 67) = 67
statfs("/", {f_type="EXT2_SUPER_MAGIC", f_bsize=4096, f_blocks=377964, f_bfree=3
57689, f_files=192000, f_ffree=188679, f_namelen=255}) = 0
stat64("/", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
open("/proc/mounts", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0444, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x700
1c000
read(3, "rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0\n/dev/root"..., 8192) = 192
stat64("/", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
close(3) = 0
munmap(0x7001c000, 8192) = 0
write(1, "/dev/sda1 -1324350 "..., 58) = 58
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: sparc
Kernel: Linux heffalump 2.4.26 #1 Wed Jul 7 23:07:44 EST 2004 sparc64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_AT
Versions of packages fileutils depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 259328-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 02:21:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 26 18:21:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from heffalump.snafu.priv.at ([202.173.190.30] helo=cft.snafu.priv.at)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Er4SS-0002KD-N9
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:21:01 -0800
Received: from cft.snafu.priv.at (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by cft.snafu.priv.at (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id
jBR2Kv2u028987
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:20:57 +1000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by cft.snafu.priv.at (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jBR2KujP028984;
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:20:56 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#259328: Fixed?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:42:04 +0100."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Alexander Zangerl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:20:35 +1000
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: kuvert 1.1.10
content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="----------=_1135650056-2428-29";
micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
It has been signed conforming to RFC3156.
You need GPG or PGP to check the signature.
------------=_1135650056-2428-29
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:42:04 +0100, Thomas Hood writes:
>Hi. Was this bug ever fixed? Is it still present in version 5.93-5?
don't know about 5.93, but it is fixed in sarge's 5.2.1-2.
regards
az
--=20
+ Alexander Zangerl + DSA 42BD645D + (RSA 5B586291)
Fachbegriffe der Informatik, Admin: Die wo machen, da=DF das Internet geht,
aber die man nicht fragen darf, wenn es um ein klemmendes Word geht, da
sonst das Internet an meinem Rechner wieder nicht geht, weil die dann
stinkew=FCtend werden. -- Bernd J=FCrgens
------------=_1135650056-2428-29
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDsKUIpy/2bEK9ZF0RAq3VAJ9DxbZJo09NsIEi/2ZVrzAIAU/1GACeI9Xg
6c8n1FbqmUzSSoC5YLwWoBo=
=1GBy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------=_1135650056-2428-29--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
