Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:11:35 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line reopened bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2005 20:18:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 11 12:18:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from windsormachine.com
([216.8.138.2] helo=router.windsormachine.com ident=postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EafLf-0007ZW-0h
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:18:11 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by router.windsormachine.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 99AFB1E40F;
Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:18:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: by router.windsormachine.com (Postfix, from userid 1042)
id EFC271E403; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:18:08 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: slocate cannot locate files that are bigger than 2 GiB
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:18:08 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-scanner: Scanned by Xamime-LT 0.1.5
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: slocate
Version: 2.7-4
Severity: normal
I discovered today that slocate cannot find a file >= 2 GiB
mike:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=1M count=2048
2048+0 records in
2048+0 records out
2147483648 bytes transferred in 56.693277 seconds (37878983 bytes/sec)
mike:~# ls -al bigfile
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2147483648 Nov 11 14:51 bigfile
mike:~# updatedb
mike:~# locate bigfile
mike:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=1M count=2047
2047+0 records in
2047+0 records out
2146435072 bytes transferred in 49.318821 seconds (43521622 bytes/sec)
mike:~# updatedb
mike:~# locate bigfile
/root/bigfile
mike:~# locate -V
Secure Locate 2.7 - Released January 24, 2003
Same behaviour for both this sarge 2.4.31 machine, and another sid 2.6.13.4
machine, so I do not think this is a kernel issue.
I tried findutil's locate in sid, and it was able to locate bigfile properly.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.31
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages slocate depends on:
ii adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups
ii dpkg 1.10.28 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 338652-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2005 05:10:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 28 21:10:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from s01060008c72b258d.vf.shawcable.net
([70.68.255.20] helo=trakker.trakker.ca ident=mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Erq3w-0004cK-Ho; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:10:52 -0800
Received: from klindsay by trakker.trakker.ca with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Erq4d-0002Qg-00; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:11:35 -0800
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:11:35 -0800
From: Kevin Lindsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: reopened bugs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: "Kevin Lindsay,,," <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
--UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The latest upload is a complete rewrite and redesign of the version on which
this bug was reported. I have not been able to reproduce this bug with this
version.
Kevin-
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 01:43:26PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> reopen 300760
> reopen 159235
> reopen 300778
> reopen 338652
> reopen 217608
> reopen 324951
> reopen 266530
> reopen 271695
> reopen 272131
> reopen 229198
> thanks
>=20
> This bugs was closed without solution:
>=20
> | * Closes: #300760, #159235, #300778, #338652, #217608, #324951, #266530
> | * Closes: #271695, #272131
> | * Closes: #229198
>=20
> Bastian
>=20
--
Kevin Lindsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP Key Id: 746C51F4
--UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDs3AHUZpV8HRsUfQRAkgyAJ9lKuVuFzgWC+eVB82Tg3yM1Yck0ACgqDg3
03K7LeZdDQF011l4fLi4c9s=
=eycp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
