Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:14:57 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line check: Documentation should mention new API
has caused the Debian Bug report #535843,
regarding check: Documentation should mention new API
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
535843: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=535843
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: check
Version: 0.9.6-2
Severity: minor
Hi!
Document and examples only uses fail_unless(). From check.h, it seems
that there are other check available:
- fail_if()
- ck_assert_int_eq()
- ck_assert_int_ne()
- ck_assert_str_eq()
- ck_assert_str_ne()
The ck_assert_* allows easier debugging. They should be mentioned in
examples or documentation. Moreover, there is a comment saying those
functions are the new API.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: fixed -1 0.9.10-2
Actually, the info docs installed with the package explains those
functions, at least since 0.9.10-2 (the oldest one in the repo).
Therefore choosing this as the fixing version and closing this bug.
--
tobi
--- End Message ---
