Your message dated Mon, 31 Aug 2015 20:26:40 +0200 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#480839: consider not starting asterisk on upgrade when no /etc/rc*/S*asterisk symlinks exists has caused the Debian Bug report #480839, regarding consider not starting asterisk on upgrade when no /etc/rc*/S*asterisk symlinks exists to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 480839: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=480839 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: asterisk Version: 1:1.2.13~dfsg-2etch2 Severity: wishlist The postrm script #!/bin/sh set -e # Automatically added by dh_installinit if [ -x "/etc/init.d/asterisk" ]; then update-rc.d asterisk defaults 21 >/dev/null if [ -x "`which invoke-rc.d 2>/dev/null`" ]; then invoke-rc.d asterisk start || exit $? else /etc/init.d/asterisk start || exit $? fi fi # End automatically added section seems to start asterisk on upgrade even if there are no "S" symlinks in /etc/rc*: # ls -l /etc/*/*asterisk* -rw-rw---- 1 asterisk asterisk 3260 2007-08-22 20:22 /etc/asterisk/asterisk.adsi -rw-rw---- 1 asterisk asterisk 247 2007-08-22 20:20 /etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 894 2007-09-20 08:34 /etc/default/asterisk -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 893 2007-09-19 23:02 /etc/default/asterisk~ -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4405 2007-08-22 20:20 /etc/init.d/asterisk -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 293 2007-08-22 20:22 /etc/logrotate.d/asterisk lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 2007-11-07 00:23 /etc/rc1.d/K10asterisk -> ../init.d/asterisk It seems I can disable asterisk startup by editing /etc/default/asterisk but this is non-trivial to do automatically (yes, it can be done with some sed tricks of course). -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.20gofrito Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages asterisk depends on: ii adduser 3.102 Add and remove users and groups ii asterisk-classic 1:1.2.13~dfsg-2etch2 Open Source Private Branch Exchang asterisk recommends no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Control: tags -1 wontfix On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:10:19 +0300 Timo Juhani Lindfors <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Faidon Liambotis <[email protected]> writes: > > I'm not sure if your rationale is valid but if it is, this affects a > > whole lot of other packages. > > Thanks. I don't unfortunately have time to investigate this further at > the moment but to me it appears to make it really hard to not > accidentally offer some service to internet (firewall should not be > the right solution here...). > > best regards, > Timo Lindfors > Hi, There is nothing we can do in debhelper AFAICT without violating Policy. If you do not want a particular daemon to run, please use 'update-rc.d disable' (or configure policy-rc.d). Thanks, ~Niels
--- End Message ---
