Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:09:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line wpasupplicant: cannot get DHPC working with ipw2200
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2006 09:37:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 06 01:37:06 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lev92-1-81-57-180-153.fbx.proxad.net ([81.57.180.153]
helo=localhost.localdomain)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Euo1y-0007aq-FJ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 01:37:06 -0800
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 930ABA737D; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:37:02 +0100 (CET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
From: Encolpe DEGOUTE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: wpasupplicant: cannot get DHPC working with ipw2200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:37:01 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: wpasupplicant
Version: 0.4.6-0.2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
first point, 0.4.7 is out, it may be fix in it.
second point, I experiment this problem under 2.6.13, 2.6.14 and 2.6.15:
http://www.bitsplitter.net/blog/?p=3D563
Resume:
I installed 2.6.13 on my Thinkpad today (it=E2=80=99s magically changed f=
rom an
R51 to an X32, you=E2=80=99re not gonna hear me complain). I figured I wo=
uld
follow up on my initial WPA Linux post and mention that the Wireless
Extensions version 18 are included now, and the ipw2200 driver uses the
wireless extensions instead of custom ioctl()s now. Net effect: compile
wpa_supplicant with CONFIG_DRIVER_WEXT=3Dy in the .config file, and run
wpa_supplicant with -D wext to use the wireless extensions when
wpa_supplicant is running. If you don=E2=80=99t you get an errors somethi=
ng like
=E2=80=9Cioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported=E2=80=9D=
when you run
wpa_supplicant. The support seems to be a little rough on this new
laptop, it takes a few tries sometimes to attach to the access point,
and for some reason I can=E2=80=99t get DHCP replies. Though if I keep tr=
ying
till it connects and then setup the interface by hand it works. I=E2=80=99=
ll
have to dig into it at some other point and see what=E2=80=99s going wron=
g.
Regards,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: LANG=3Dfr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Dfr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)
Versions of packages wpasupplicant depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared librar=
ies an
ii libreadline5 5.1-5 GNU readline and history lib=
raries
ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8a-5 SSL shared libraries
wpasupplicant recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 346196-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2006 17:10:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 10 09:10:00 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mxfep01.bredband.com ([195.54.107.70])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EwN0R-0004av-Om
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:10:00 -0800
Received: from laga ([213.114.65.190] [213.114.65.190])
by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:09:28 +0100
Received: from [192.168.2.16] (helo=localhost.localdomain)
by laga with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1EwMzw-0001vB-EV; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:09:28 +0100
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=leka)
by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1EwN04-0007Kt-47; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:09:36 +0100
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:09:36 +0100
From: Martin Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Encolpe Degoute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: wpasupplicant: cannot get DHPC working with ipw2200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r655 (Debian)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 0.4.6-0.2
Encolpe Degoute @ 2006-01-10 (Tuesday), 15:28 (+0100)
> Martin Samuelsson a écrit :
> | Try changing driver from ipw to wext in /etc/default/wpasupplicant, as
> | noted in /usr/share/doc/wpasupplicant/README.Debian.
>
> It was that.
I'm taking myself the liberty of trying to close this bug now. According
to http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer only you or Kyle McMartin should
do it, but as this is a clear case of misconfiguration I'm taking the
action.
> Thanks for your help,
No worries.
--
/Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
