Your message dated Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:41:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#345151: new upstream release
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2005 11:42:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 29 03:42:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shadowland.snow-crash.org
([80.190.250.253] helo=ned.snow-crash.org ident=postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ErwB7-0001pT-Ds
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 03:42:41 -0800
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p50895DE4.dip.t-dialin.net [80.137.93.228])
by ned.snow-crash.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A7244979;
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:42:38 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Steffen Joeris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: new upstream release
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:41:29 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: lzop
Severity: wishlist
Hi Peter
There is a new upstream release from lzop.
I think the current state is lzop 1.02 rc1
and the author also writes:
"(As of Nov 2005 there has not been any problem report, and 1.02rc1 will
likely get released as official version 1.02.)".
I got these information from
http://www.lzop.org/
Can you please think about packaging it?
Greetings
Steffen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 345151-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2006 21:41:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 11 13:41:56 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.21])
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EwnjA-0004FH-C6
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:41:56 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2006 21:41:24 -0000
Received: from dslb-084-063-060-221.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO colt.pezone.net)
[84.63.60.221]
by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 11 Jan 2006 22:41:24 +0100
X-Authenticated: #495269
From: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#345151: new upstream release
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:41:22 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Steffen Joeris wrote:
> There is a new upstream release from lzop.
> I think the current state is lzop 1.02 rc1
When there is a release, it will be packaged. I don't see a reason why
a release candidate version should be packaged now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
