Your message dated Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:57:05 +0200
with message-id 
<cafnvkc2aj5dzam0jvgujs37mzm+wvxs8f74_mhckeytl+gu...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line python-yubico: Make sure python-yubico works with pyusb>1.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #773199,
regarding python-yubico: Make sure python-yubico works with pyusb>1.0
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
773199: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773199
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-yubico
Version: 1.1.0-2
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

python-usb 1.0 will soon (hopefully) be uploaded to experimental.
It would be nice to ensure that python-yubico also works with
this version of pyusb. Hopefully it works well without any changes.

A version of pyusb>1.0 can be found on: 
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/pyusb

Regards,
Ruben



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages python-yubico depends on:
ii  python          2.7.8-2
ii  python-support  1.0.15
ii  python-usb      1.0.0b2-1

python-yubico recommends no packages.

python-yubico suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: python-yubico

I've used python-yubico with pyusb 1.0.0b2 (from PyPI, installed via
pip) with no issues. As far as I know the backwards compatibility
layer of pyusb 1.0 works just fine (as I said, I've had no issues), so
I'm closing this issue.

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to