Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2015 03:21:29 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#801829: gnome-control-center dependency breaks
has caused the Debian Bug report #801829,
regarding gnome-control-center dependency breaks
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
801829: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801829
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gnome-control-center
Version: gnome-control-center dependecy breaks
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Given: libcheese-gtk25, libcheese8 vs. libcheese-gtk23, libcheese7 connundrum.
Why in the hell is this crap continuing to happen? You roll out
gnome-control-center with hard dependency on obsolete libcheese and
libcheese-gtk packages.
Then you roll out the cheese 3.18.1 to match gnome-control-center 3.18.1 but
instead of re-rolling a second build to update the proper dependencies you have
your debian-buildd channel with different dependencies leaving a broken staged
solution.
Roll cheese out first and then gnome-control-center, then roll them both out to
incoming.debian.org.
On top of all that you have a dozen other packages that will de-install due to
their 3.18.1 dependencies on libcheese7. Get the stuff synced with dependencies
before you make them public.
This isn't tensor calculus. It's straight forward. Stage them non-publically,
then roll them out as test builds to test. Not much to test when installation
breaks, repeatedly. Gimping ourselves to a full GNOME 3.18.1 isn't
professional, whether one pays a support contract or gets it free. It just
pisses people off to switch distributions. The old excuse you don't pay for it
don't fly anymore. Enough corporate sponsors have been subsidizing Linux and
its community to the tune of billions over the past two decades. I've used
Debian for 15 years to compliment OS X. These major Desktop Environment
releases are getting worse, not better. The KDE 4 to 5 is just as bad. But this
GCC 5 crap takes the cake. So not looking forward to Perl and LibPNG.
Marc J. Driftmeyer
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages gnome-control-center depends on:
ii accountsservice 0.6.40-3
ii apg 2.2.3.dfsg.1-2
ii colord 1.2.11-1
ii desktop-file-utils 0.22-1
ii gnome-control-center-data 1:3.18.1-1
ii gnome-desktop3-data 3.18.1-1
ii gnome-icon-theme 3.12.0-1
ii gnome-icon-theme-symbolic 3.12.0-1
ii gnome-settings-daemon 3.18.1-1
ii gsettings-desktop-schemas 3.18.0-1
ii libaccountsservice0 0.6.40-3
ii libatk1.0-0 2.18.0-1
ii libc6 2.21-0experimental1
ii libcairo-gobject2 1.14.2-2
ii libcairo2 1.14.2-2
ii libcanberra-gtk3-0 0.30-2.1
ii libcanberra0 0.30-2.1
pn libcheese-gtk23 <none>
pn libcheese7 <none>
ii libclutter-1.0-0 1.24.2-1
ii libclutter-gtk-1.0-0 1.6.6-1
ii libcolord-gtk1 0.1.25-1.1+b1
ii libcolord2 1.2.11-1
ii libcups2 2.1.0-4
ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.104-1
ii libfontconfig1 2.11.0-6.3
ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.32.1-1
ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 11.0.2-1
ii libglib2.0-0 2.46.0-2
ii libgnome-bluetooth13 3.18.0-1
ii libgnome-desktop-3-10 3.16.2-2
ii libgoa-1.0-0b 3.18.0-1
ii libgoa-backend-1.0-1 3.18.0-1
ii libgrilo-0.2-1 0.2.14-1
ii libgtk-3-0 3.18.2-1
ii libgtop-2.0-10 2.32.0-1
ii libgudev-1.0-0 230-2
ii libibus-1.0-5 1.5.10-1
ii libkrb5-3 1.13.2+dfsg-2
ii libmm-glib0 1.4.12-1
ii libnm-glib-vpn1 1.0.6-1
ii libnm-glib4 1.0.6-1
ii libnm-gtk0 1.0.6-2
ii libnm-util2 1.0.6-1
ii libpango-1.0-0 1.38.0-3
ii libpangocairo-1.0-0 1.38.0-3
ii libpolkit-gobject-1-0 0.113-1
ii libpulse-mainloop-glib0 7.0-1
ii libpulse0 7.0-1
ii libpwquality1 1.2.3-1
ii libsmbclient 2:4.3.0+dfsg-2
ii libsoup2.4-1 2.52.1-1
ii libupower-glib3 0.99.3-1+b2
ii libwacom2 0.15-1
ii libx11-6 2:1.6.3-1
ii libxi6 2:1.7.5-1
ii libxml2 2.9.2+zdfsg1-4
Versions of packages gnome-control-center recommends:
ii cracklib-runtime 2.9.2-1+b1
ii cups-pk-helper 0.2.5-2+b1
ii gkbd-capplet 3.6.0-1
ii gnome-online-accounts 3.18.0-1
ii gnome-user-guide 3.18.1-1
ii gnome-user-share 3.18.0-1
ii iso-codes 3.62-1
ii libnss-myhostname 227-2
ii mesa-utils 8.2.0-1
ii mousetweaks 3.12.0-1
ii network-manager-gnome 1.0.6-2
ii policykit-1-gnome 0.105-2
ii realmd 0.16.2-1
ii rygel 0.28.0-2
ii rygel-tracker 0.28.0-2
ii system-config-printer 1.5.7-1
Versions of packages gnome-control-center suggests:
ii gstreamer1.0-pulseaudio 1.6.0-1
ii libcanberra-gtk-module 0.30-2.1
ii libcanberra-gtk3-module 0.30-2.1
ii x11-xserver-utils 7.7+5
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Am 15.10.2015 um 02:16 schrieb Marc J. Driftmeyer:
> Package: gnome-control-center
> Version: gnome-control-center dependecy breaks
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Given: libcheese-gtk25, libcheese8 vs. libcheese-gtk23, libcheese7 connundrum.
>
> Why in the hell is this crap continuing to happen? You roll out
> gnome-control-center with hard dependency on obsolete libcheese and
> libcheese-gtk packages.
>
> Then you roll out the cheese 3.18.1 to match gnome-control-center 3.18.1 but
> instead of re-rolling a second build to update the proper dependencies you
> have your debian-buildd channel with different dependencies leaving a broken
> staged solution.
>
> Roll cheese out first and then gnome-control-center, then roll them both out
> to incoming.debian.org.
>
> On top of all that you have a dozen other packages that will de-install due
> to their 3.18.1 dependencies on libcheese7. Get the stuff synced with
> dependencies before you make them public.
>
> This isn't tensor calculus. It's straight forward. Stage them non-publically,
> then roll them out as test builds to test. Not much to test when installation
> breaks, repeatedly. Gimping ourselves to a full GNOME 3.18.1 isn't
> professional, whether one pays a support contract or gets it free. It just
> pisses people off to switch distributions. The old excuse you don't pay for
> it don't fly anymore. Enough corporate sponsors have been subsidizing Linux
> and its community to the tune of billions over the past two decades. I've
> used Debian for 15 years to compliment OS X. These major Desktop Environment
> releases are getting worse, not better. The KDE 4 to 5 is just as bad. But
> this GCC 5 crap takes the cake. So not looking forward to Perl and LibPNG.
This is not a bug report, bug a rant.
If you can't want until all packages have been rebuilt, sid, is the
wrong distribution for you.
Please don't continue filing such useless bug report.
Closing.
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
