Your message dated Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:43:11 +0100
with message-id
<camezbd+hphoyfopph4i3xlg+tvwsjhvacwa63tckhbzal8w...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line close 761530
has caused the Debian Bug report #761530,
regarding nuitka: FTBFS: Tests failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
761530: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=761530
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: nuitka
Version: 0.5.4+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: [email protected]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140913 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/«BUILDDIR»/nuitka-0.5.4+ds'
> ./misc/check-release
> Cannot execute tests with Python 2.6, disabled or not installed.
> Executing test case called python2.7-debug with CPython python2.7 and extra
> flags '--debug'.
> Running the basic tests with options '--debug' with python2.7:
> Run './tests/basics/run_all.py search' in '/«BUILDDIR»/nuitka-0.5.4+ds'.
> Using concrete python 2.7.8 on x86_64
> Comparing output of 'Asserts.py' using 'python2.7' with flags silent,
> expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'Assignments.py' using 'python2.7' with flags silent,
> expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'BigConstants.py' using 'python2.7' with flags silent,
> expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'Branching.py' using 'python2.7' with flags silent,
> expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'BuiltinOverload.py' using 'python2.7' with flags silent,
> expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'BuiltinSuper.py' using 'python2.7' with flags silent,
> expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'BuiltinsTest.py' using 'python2.7' with flags silent,
> expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'Classes.py' using 'python2.7' with flags silent,
> expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'ComparisonChains.py' using 'python2.7' with flags
> silent, expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'Constants.py' using 'python2.7' with flags silent,
> expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'Constants27.py' using 'python2.7' with flags silent,
> expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'Crashers.py' using 'python2.7' with flags silent,
> expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'Decorators.py' using 'python2.7' with flags silent,
> expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'DefaultParameters.py' using 'python2.7' with flags
> silent, expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'DoubleDeletions.py' using 'python2.7' with flags silent,
> expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'Empty.py' using 'python2.7' with flags silent,
> expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'ExceptionRaising.py' using 'python2.7' with flags
> silent, expect_success, remove_output ...
> Comparing output of 'ExecEval.py' using 'python2.7' with flags silent,
> expect_success, remove_output ...
> --- python2.7 (stdout)
> +++ nuitka (stdout)
>
> @@ -10,11 +10,11 @@
>
> execfile with globals and locals dict: {'e': 7, 'f': 8}
> execfile with globals and locals dict in a function: None ['__builtins__',
> 'e', 'f'] {'e': 7, 'f': 8} 0 0
> execfile in a class: 7 8
> -Exec with None as tuple args did update locals: 1
> -Exec with None as normal args did update locals: 2
> +Exec with None as tuple args did update locals: 0
> +Exec with None as normal args did update locals: 0
> Eval with None arguments from variables did access locals: 11
> -Exec with None as tuple args from variable did update locals: 1
> -Exec with None as normal args did update locals: 2
> +Exec with None as tuple args from variable did update locals: 0
> +Exec with None as normal args did update locals: 0
> Exec with a future division definition and one without:
> 3/2 is with future division 1.5
> 3/2 is without future division 1
> Error, outputs differed.
> Error exit! 1
> debian/rules:16: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_test' failed
> make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Error 1
The full build log is available from:
http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2014/09/13/nuitka_0.5.4+ds-1_unstable.log
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
close 761530
The issue was caused by a behaviour change of CPython in a
minor version uploaded to the archive. The test has been updated
and it should now build.
Yours,
Kay
--- End Message ---
