Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:31:52 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#257060: Any news?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2004 20:58:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 30 13:58:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BfmA4-0002zC-00; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:58:32 -0700
Received: by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with local
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        id 1BfmA3-00035l-00; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:58:31 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:58:31 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Jackson)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: squid logfile rotation very strange
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under Emacs 19.34.1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: squid
Version: 2.4.6-2woody2

My squid logfile area has strange contents:

-davenant:~> cd /var/log/squid/
-davenant:squid> ll
total 2884
drwxr-xr-x    2 proxy    proxy        4096 Jun 30 06:46 ./
drwxrwsr-x   16 root     adm          4096 Jun 30 06:55 ../
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy       69198 Jun 30 21:06 access.log
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy     1269645 Mar  6  2003 access.log.0
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy      183389 Jun 30 02:07 access.log.1
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy        1708 Mar 17  2000 access.log.2
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy        7000 Jun 29 01:44 access.log.2.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy         296 Jun 30 06:46 cache.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 proxy    proxy        1941 Mar  6  2003 cache.log.0
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy         296 Jun 29 06:46 cache.log.1
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy        2284 Mar 17  2000 cache.log.2
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy         187 Jun 28 06:46 cache.log.2.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy         302 Jul 22  1998 cache.log.4.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy         300 Jul 21  1998 cache.log.5.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy         303 Jul 20  1998 cache.log.6.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy         301 Jul 19  1998 cache.log.7.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root            0 Mar  6  2003 squid.out.0
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root           32 Mar  5  2003 squid.out.1.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root           32 Mar  4  2003 squid.out.2.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy       71111 Jun 30 21:33 store.log
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy     1008179 Mar  6  2003 store.log.0
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy      212651 Jun 30 06:33 store.log.1
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy         318 Mar 17  2000 store.log.2
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy       18861 Jun 29 06:33 store.log.2.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy          32 Jul 21  1998 store.log.4.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy          32 Jul 20  1998 store.log.5.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy          32 Jul 19  1998 store.log.6.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 proxy    proxy         637 Jul 18  1998 store.log.7.gz
-davenant:squid>

Problems seem to include:

 - access.log and access.log.1 are recent but access.log.0 is
   ancient ?!  Etc.
 - the retention period seems to have been changed, without asking me,
   but old logs weren't deleted.

This is on a machine which has had Debian on it for some time.
Another machine in a similar position also has a similar problem.

Ian.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 257060-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2006 18:31:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 17 10:31:55 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk ([193.201.200.170] ident=mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EyvcZ-00015C-6u; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:31:55 -0800
Received: by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with local
        (return-path [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        id 1EyvcW-0007AX-00; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:31:52 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:31:52 +0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Jackson)
To: Luigi Gangitano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
    [EMAIL PROTECTED],
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#257060: Any news?
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under Emacs 19.34.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Luigi Gangitano writes ("Bug#257060: Any news?"):
> I'm still waiting for more information on this bug. If you agree I'm
> going to close it in 3 months.

Sorry about the delay.

I have checked again and my earlier removal the errant leftover files
seems to have stuck, so that they didn't come back.  So it must have
been a problem with one of the upgrades several years ago.

So I'm closing the bug now as you suggest.

Regards,
Ian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to