Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:33:32 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273468: fixed in dpkg-repack 1.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Sep 2004 10:32:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 26 03:32:44 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mtagate1.uk.ibm.com [195.212.29.134] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CBWKh-0004yA-00; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:32:43 -0700
Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com 
(d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185])
        by mtagate1.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8QAWCDq192760
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:32:12 GMT
Received: from mail-gw2.hursley.ibm.com (d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com 
[9.149.37.228])
        by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id 
i8QAWCL7121978
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:32:12 +0100
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail-gw2.hursley.ibm.com)
        by mail-gw2.hursley.ibm.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
        id 1CBWKC-0003T8-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:32:12 +0100
Received: from [9.20.136.27] (helo=sp15en17.hursley.ibm.com)
        by mail-gw2.hursley.ibm.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
        id 1CBWKB-0003T3-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:32:11 +0100
Received: from tracey.hursley.ibm.com (tracey.hursley.ibm.com [9.20.239.14])
        by sp15en17.hursley.ibm.com (AIX5.1/8.11.6p2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id 
i8QAWDa507238
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:32:13 +0100
Received: from ferriera by tracey.hursley.ibm.com with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CBWKB-00059k-Gq
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:32:11 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andrew Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dpkg-repack: Could provide facility to leave temporary directory in 
place
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.3
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:32:11 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Andrew Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: dpkg-repack
Version: 1.19
Severity: wishlist

It would be nice if dpkg-repack could provide an option similar to this one in 
alien (from man page):

-g, --generate
Generate a temporary directory suitable for building a package from, but do 
not actually create the package. This is useful if you want to move files 
around in the package before building it. The package can be built from this 
temporary directory by running "debian/rules binary", if you were creating a 
Debian package, or by running "rpmbuild -bb <packagename>.spec" if you were 
creating a Red Hat package.

Since it's obvious from watching dpkg-repack at work that it does create a 
temporary directory to build the package from, I wouldn't imagine implementing 
this would be particularly hard. I think it would be useful when you want to 
hack around a problem with a package, and since dpkg-repack is arguably a 
utility for advanced users anyway, I don't think providing this would raise 
usability issues.

Thanks,
Andrew.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages dpkg-repack depends on:
ii  dpkg-dev                      1.10.23    Package building tools for Debian
ii  perl                          5.8.4-2.2  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 273468-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2006 22:40:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 17 14:40:42 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EyzOO-0003do-J7; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:33:32 -0800
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#273468: fixed in dpkg-repack 1.22
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:33:32 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: dpkg-repack
Source-Version: 1.22

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dpkg-repack, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dpkg-repack_1.22.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dpkg-repack/dpkg-repack_1.22.dsc
dpkg-repack_1.22.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/dpkg-repack/dpkg-repack_1.22.tar.gz
dpkg-repack_1.22_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpkg-repack/dpkg-repack_1.22_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dpkg-repack package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:58:38 -0500
Source: dpkg-repack
Binary: dpkg-repack
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.22
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 dpkg-repack - puts an unpacked .deb file back together
Closes: 273468
Changes: 
 dpkg-repack (1.22) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Add --generate option. Closes: #273468
Files: 
 9c55f4fd8e503f72c9b19d92fa8e89d8 512 admin optional dpkg-repack_1.22.dsc
 68e9b828bb3a93fef12a35a62c179c7e 15844 admin optional dpkg-repack_1.22.tar.gz
 d31a6f932ebb97334f81b40a55c5bb01 11114 admin optional dpkg-repack_1.22_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDzVrp2tp5zXiKP0wRAm+ZAJ4woMMtu20riLRLplWCPSJTauHSCgCfVFa5
yXfcMUs7pjteKCEIwXH4JQQ=
=gI1k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to