Your message dated Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:18:18 +0900
with message-id
<CAPpVEmVSnpPjicaehANkrTihDJt3+Y1fs0zvJtPQmmm4=yq...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #462365,
regarding snmpd: error : c64 32 bit check failed looks like a 64bit wrap, but
prev!=new
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
462365: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=462365
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: snmpd
Version: 5.2.3-7
Severity: minor
In snmpd logs, I have regularly the following lines :
snmpd[23355]: c64 32 bit check failed
snmpd[23355]: looks like a 64bit wrap, but prev!=new
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-xen-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages snmpd depends on:
ii adduser 3.102 Add and remove users and groups
ii debconf 1.5.11etch1 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13etch4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libsensors3 1:2.10.1-3 library to read temperature/voltag
ii libsnmp9 5.2.3-7 NET SNMP (Simple Network Managemen
ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-13 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
snmpd recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
snmpd/upgradefrom36:
snmpd/upgradefrom521:
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Same issue was reported in RHBZ and fixed in RHEL.
see
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/5.7_Technical_Notes/net-snmp.html#RHBA-2011-1076
And changes in the patch (net-snmp-5.3.2.2-stats-64-wrap.patch) was merged
into upstream.
--
Hideki Yamane
--- End Message ---
