Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:47:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348769: fixed in netenv 0.94.3-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jan 2006 22:05:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 18 14:05:46 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.27])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EzLR4-0004Bn-BA
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:05:46 -0800
Received: from smtp.mini-dweeb.org (mini-dweeb.org [81.56.242.187])
        by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAB462F41
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:05:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by smtp.mini-dweeb.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8C462E463
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:05:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp.mini-dweeb.org ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (velma [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
        id 23832-04 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:05:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: by smtp.mini-dweeb.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id C5EE462E464; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:05:22 +0100 (CET)
From: Arnaud Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: netenv: upgrade failure
X-PGP-Fingerprint: D792 B8A5 A567 B001 C342  2613 BDF2 A220 5E36 19D3
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-Mailer: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
X-GnuPG-KeyID: 5E3619D3
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:05:18 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==-=-=";
        micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at mini-dweeb.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

--==-=-=
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: netenv
Version: 0.94.3-16
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

Hello,

I have a problem during package upgrade :

(Reading database ... 81872 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace netenv 0.94.3-16 (using netenv_0.94.3-16_all.deb)
...
Unpacking replacement netenv ...
Setting up netenv (0.94.3-16) ...
rm: cannot remove `/tmp/filez2sx6U': No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing netenv (--install):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
  netenv

I have attached a patch. I hope it will help.

Regards,

=2D- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'ex=
perimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-maggie
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages netenv depends on:
ii  coreutils                 5.93-5         The GNU core utilities
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]     1.4.67         Debian configuration managemen=
t sy
ii  dialog                    1.0-20060101-1 Displays user-friendly dialog =
boxe

netenv recommends no packages.

=2D- debconf information excluded

=2D-=20
Arnaud Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.andesi.org/ | GPG
Public Key available on pgp.mit.edu | Fingerprint: D792 B8A5 A567 B001
C342 2613 BDF2 A220 5E36 19D3


--=-=-=
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=config.diff
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=2D-- config.old        2006-01-18 22:48:04.000000000 +0100
+++ config      2006-01-18 22:45:11.000000000 +0100
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
   TMP_INTERFACES=3D`tempfile 2> /dev/null`
   trap 'rm $TMP_INTERFACES' 0 1 2 3 13 15
   TMP2_INTERFACES=3D`tempfile 2> /dev/null`
=2D  trap 'rm $TMP2_INTERFACES' 0 1 2 3 13 15
+  trap 'rm -f $TMP2_INTERFACES' 0 1 2 3 13 15
   # filter out commented and blank lines, get the 5 lines=20
   # following the eth0 entry. (the || true is necessary because we are set=
 -e)
   egrep -v '^[[:blank:]]*$|^#' $INTERFACES 2>/dev/null | grep -A 5 "iface =
eth0" > $TMP_INTERFACES || true

--=-=-=--

--==-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDzruivfKiIF42GdMRAiBMAKCVN2jz7fGiFi48Ikrmgsww4kU18gCdHFqS
Sjf9aT8E4C6BTnFvDJ1Sgg4=
=8/39
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==-=-=--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 348769-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2006 09:50:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 19 01:50:28 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EzWNp-0007BM-B8; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:47:09 -0800
From: =?utf-8?q?Frank_K=C3=BCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#348769: fixed in netenv 0.94.3-17
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:47:09 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: netenv
Source-Version: 0.94.3-17

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netenv, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

netenv_0.94.3-17.diff.gz
  to pool/main/n/netenv/netenv_0.94.3-17.diff.gz
netenv_0.94.3-17.dsc
  to pool/main/n/netenv/netenv_0.94.3-17.dsc
netenv_0.94.3-17_all.deb
  to pool/main/n/netenv/netenv_0.94.3-17_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated netenv package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:08:05 +0100
Source: netenv
Binary: netenv
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.94.3-17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 netenv     - Configure your system for different network environments
Closes: 348769
Changes: 
 netenv (0.94.3-17) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Don't let the traps fail if a tempfile is not present, thanks to
     Arnaud Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (closes: #348769)
Files: 
 ed03d29cb662016e780d80dc91a32688 572 admin extra netenv_0.94.3-17.dsc
 59588ccd2d4570dcabb3d2c7a7c208b1 46812 admin extra netenv_0.94.3-17.diff.gz
 f4e4d23b0dc6e5c8c78a473ff10d429f 72688 admin extra netenv_0.94.3-17_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDz11N+xs9YyJS+hoRAuv6AKCoIaSlCx2KM6UHIyYAKxB2piibvACfc1Il
zhXpy+BQsfbUNrDodpvAgjA=
=SemO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to