Your message dated Thu, 31 Mar 2016 21:47:53 +1100 with message-id <cagrgngxwuzzfj7ckjbqpbr5qye8kdd7mfunz2aren+p5wzt...@mail.gmail.com> and subject line Closing due to it being a duplicate has caused the Debian Bug report #819632, regarding udev rules and hwdb entries installed in wrong directory (dupe) to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 819632: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819632 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: libratbag3 Version: 0.4-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome of this action? * What outcome did you expect instead? *** End of the template - remove these template lines *** Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Julian Calaby <jcalaby@kbytebucket> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[email protected]> Subject: libratbag3: Udev rules and hwdb entries installed in wrong directory Message-ID: <145942004521.2272.6955824414596323488.reportbug@kbytebucket> X-Mailer: reportbug 6.6.6 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 21:27:25 +1100 Package: libratbag3 Version: 0.4-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, libratbag3 installs it's udev rules and hwdb rules in /lib/udev/udev/rules.d and /lib/udev/udev/hwdb.d where it should be installing them in /lib/udev/rules.d and /lib/udev/hwdb.d respectively. Thanks, Julian Calaby -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing-proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages libratbag3 depends on: ii libc6 2.22-4 ii libevdev2 1.4.6+dfsg-1 ii libudev1 229-3 libratbag3 recommends no packages. libratbag3 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing-proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages libratbag3 depends on: ii libc6 2.22-4 ii libevdev2 1.4.6+dfsg-1 ii libudev1 229-3 libratbag3 recommends no packages. libratbag3 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---So, I fail reportbug forever. I submitted this twice as I got the from address of #819633 wrong and subsequently submitted this one from the backup that reportbug handily leaves behind. This fscked everything up as my system here is nice enough to turn my local email addresses into semi-real ones and everything got submitted correctly. Sorry for the noise. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: [email protected] Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
--- End Message ---
